Literature DB >> 17462893

Selective imitation in domestic dogs.

Friederike Range1, Zsófia Viranyi, Ludwig Huber.   

Abstract

The transmission of cultural knowledge requires learners to identify what relevant information to retain and selectively imitate when observing others' skills. Young human infants--without relying on language or theory of mind--already show evidence of this ability. If, for example, in a communicative context, a model demonstrates a head action instead of a more efficient hand action, infants imitate the head action only if the demonstrator had no good reason to do so, suggesting that their imitation is a selective, interpretative process [1]. Early sensitivity to ostensive-communicative cues and to the efficiency of goal-directed actions is thought to be a crucial prerequisite for such relevance-guided selective imitation [2]. Although this competence is thought to be human specific [2], here we show an analog capacity in the dog. In our experiment, subjects watched a demonstrator dog pulling a rod with the paw instead of the preferred mouth action. In the first group, using the "inefficient" action was justified by the model's carrying of a ball in her mouth, whereas in the second group, no constraints could explain the demonstrator's choice. In the first trial after observation, dogs imitated the nonpreferred action only in the second group. Consequently, dogs, like children, demonstrated inferential selective imitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17462893     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.04.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  36 in total

1.  Automatic imitation in dogs.

Authors:  Friederike Range; Ludwig Huber; Cecilia Heyes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Social cognition and the evolution of language: constructing cognitive phylogenies.

Authors:  W Tecumseh Fitch; Ludwig Huber; Thomas Bugnyar
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 3.  Imitation as an inheritance system.

Authors:  Nicholas Shea
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Can your dog read your mind?: Understanding the causes of canine perspective taking.

Authors:  Monique A R Udell; Nicole R Dorey; Clive D L Wynne
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 5.  The neuroscience of perceptual categorization in pigeons: A mechanistic hypothesis.

Authors:  Onur Güntürkün; Charlotte Koenen; Fabrizio Iovine; Alexis Garland; Roland Pusch
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  (Mis)understanding mirror neurons.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok; Marc Hauser
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 7.  Evolution of mirror systems: a simple mechanism for complex cognitive functions.

Authors:  Luca Bonini; Pier Francesco Ferrari
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 8.  Emulation, imitation, over-imitation and the scope of culture for child and chimpanzee.

Authors:  Andrew Whiten; Nicola McGuigan; Sarah Marshall-Pescini; Lydia M Hopper
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 9.  The evolution of imitation: what do the capacities of non-human animals tell us about the mechanisms of imitation?

Authors:  Ludwig Huber; Friederike Range; Bernhard Voelkl; Andrea Szucsich; Zsófia Virányi; Adam Miklosi
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 10.  Associative sequence learning: the role of experience in the development of imitation and the mirror system.

Authors:  Caroline Catmur; Vincent Walsh; Cecilia Heyes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.