Literature DB >> 17462459

A revised scoring system utilizing serum alphafetoprotein levels to expand candidates for living donor transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Sung Hoon Yang1, Kyung-Suk Suh, Hae Won Lee, Eung-Ho Cho, Jai Young Cho, Yong Beom Cho, In Hwan Kim, Nam-Joon Yi, Kuhn Uk Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The development of living donor liver transplantation has stimulated discussion about the expansion of tumor burden limits for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although serum alphafetoprotein (AFP) level is an important predictor of tumor recurrence, it is not included in the existing selection criteria for HCC in transplantation.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 63 consecutive adults with HCC diagnosed preoperatively who received living donor liver transplantation from February 1999 to September 2005 and survived over 1 month. The authors devised new scoring criteria that included tumor size, tumor number, and pretransplant AFP level as prognostic factors. The score of each parameter was classified from 1 to 4 points (tumor size, < or =3, 3.1 to 5, 5.1 to 6.5, >6.5 cm; tumor number, 1, 2 or 3, 4 or 5, or > or =6 nodules; and AFP, < or =20, 20.1 to 200, 200.1 to 1000, >1000 ng/mL, respectively). We defined that 3 to 6 points and 7 to 12 points were "transplantable" and "nontransplantable," respectively. The usefulness of the devised criteria was then investigated as a method of selecting candidates with HCC for transplantation.
RESULTS: The candidates' overall 3-year survival rate and recurrence-free survival rate were 67% and 70% after transplantation, respectively. Based on pretransplant imaging, 37 (59%), 41 (65%), and 44 (70%) of the 63 patients met the Milan criteria, University of Californica, San Francisco (UCSF) criteria, and the new scoring criteria. Their 3-year survival rates were 80%, 78%, and 79%, respectively. Moreover, based on posttransplant data, the scoring criteria correlated with the risk of death and HCC recurrence (Milan criteria, P = .005 and .001; UCSF criteria, P = .013 and .001 for death and recurrence; scoring criteria, P < .001 for both).
CONCLUSIONS: The newly devised scoring criteria could expand usefully current selection criteria for transplantation without detrimentally affecting outcome in the living donor transplantation setting for HCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17462459     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  32 in total

1.  Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhosis: strategies to avoid tumor recurrence.

Authors:  Marco Vivarelli; Andrea Risaliti
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Clinical outcomes of liver transplantation for HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma: data from the NIH HBV OLT study.

Authors:  Steven-Huy Han; K Rajender Reddy; Emmet B Keeffe; Consuelo Soldevila-Pico; Robert Gish; Raymond T Chung; Bulent Degertekin; Anna Lok
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 2.863

3.  Patient and tumour biology predict survival beyond the Milan criteria in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Andreas Andreou; Safak Gül; Andreas Pascher; Wenzel Schöning; Hussein Al-Abadi; Marcus Bahra; Fritz Klein; Timm Denecke; Benjamin Strücker; Gero Puhl; Johann Pratschke; Daniel Seehofer
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 4.  Liver transplantation for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: how far can we go?

Authors:  Kyung-Suk Suh; Hae Won Lee
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2015-01-12

Review 5.  Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria: A review.

Authors:  Dong-Wei Xu; Ping Wan; Qiang Xia
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Contribution of alpha-fetoprotein in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Bérénice Charrière; Charlotte Maulat; Bertrand Suc; Fabrice Muscari
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-07-28

Review 7.  Living vs. deceased-donor liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Kohei Ogawa; Yasutsugu Takada
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-05-04

Review 8.  Selection of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma for liver transplantation: Past and future.

Authors:  Arturo Soriano; Aranzazu Varona; Rajesh Gianchandani; Modesto Enrique Moneva; Javier Arranz; Antonio Gonzalez; Manuel Barrera
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-01-08

Review 9.  Liver transplantation for hepatobiliary malignancies: a new era of "Transplant Oncology" has begun.

Authors:  Taizo Hibi; Osamu Itano; Masahiro Shinoda; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Liberal policy in living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: lessons learned.

Authors:  Georgios C Sotiropoulos; Hauke Lang; George Sgourakis; Silvio Nadalin; Ernesto P Molmenti; Arnold Radtke; Andreas Paul; Susanne Beckebaum; Fuat H Saner; Hideo A Baba; Guido Gerken; Massimo Malagó; Christoph E Broelsch
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.