Literature DB >> 17462374

Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: risk factors for early and late mortality.

Spencer J Melby1, Andreas Zierer, Scott P Kaiser, Tracey J Guthrie, Jason D Keune, Richard B Schuessler, Michael K Pasque, Jennifer S Lawton, Nader Moazami, Marc R Moon, Ralph J Damiano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Excellent outcomes after aortic valve replacement (AVR) in elderly patients can be achieved, yet some practitioners are reticent to refer elderly patients for surgery. This study analyzed risk factors for mortality in patients aged 80 years and older undergoing AVR with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 245 patients (129 women) with a mean age of 83.6 +/- 2.9 years who had AVR with (n = 140) or without CABG (n = 105) at a single institution from 1993 to 2005. Data were analyzed with a multivariate logistic regression for predictors of operative mortality, Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival, and a Cox multivariate proportional analysis of factors influencing long-term survival.
RESULTS: Mean preoperative New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification was 3.1 +/- 0.9, and 78% (192/245) of patients were classified as NYHA class III or IV. Operative (30-day) mortality was 9% (22/245). Independent risk factors for operative mortality included postoperative renal failure (odds ratio [OR], 20.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.5 to 67.6; p < 0.001), postoperative permanent stroke (OR, 11.3; 95% CI, 1.7 to 75.1; p = 0.019), or intraoperative/postoperative intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) placement (OR, 14.9; 95% CI 2.9 to 75.8; p = 0.002). Survival after surgery was 82% (n = 183) at 1 year and 56% (n = 88) at 5 years. Prognostic factors for decreased long-term survival were regurgitant valve pathology (hazard ratio [HR], 6.0; 95% CI, 2.5 to 14.2; p = 0.002), intraoperative/postoperative IABP (HR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.4 to 6.0; p = 0.010), postoperative renal failure (HR, 3.5, 95% CI, 2.2 to 5.7; p < 0.001), and postoperative stroke (HR, 7.0, 95% CI, 3.2 to 15.9; p < 0.001). Performing concomitant CABG was protective in terms of operative mortality (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.83; p = 0.017) and improved long-term survival (HR, 0.7, 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.96; p = 0.020). Preoperative NYHA classification did not affect operative or long-term survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients aged 80 years and older who undergo AVR have acceptable short-term and long-term survival regardless of NYHA status. Concomitant CABG improved operative and long-term survival in this population. Despite their increased age, aggressive surgical treatment is warranted for most patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17462374     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.09.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  28 in total

1.  Heart valve surgery in octogenarians: operative and long-term results.

Authors:  Shigeaki Aoyagi; Shuji Fukunaga; Koichi Arinaga; Hiroshi Tomoeda; Koji Akasu; Tomohiro Ueda
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Long-term outcomes of isolated aortic valve replacement and concomitant AVR and coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  G A de Waard; E K Jansen; M de Mulder; A B A Vonk; V A Umans
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.380

3.  Aortic valve replacement vs. transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Patient selection.

Authors:  Jian Ye; Jia Lin Soon; John Webb
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-07

4.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Hersh S Maniar; Alan Zojarias
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug

Review 5.  Incidence, predictors, origin and prevention of early and late neurological events after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): a comprehensive review of current data.

Authors:  Philipp Kahlert; Fadi Al-Rashid; Björn Plicht; Heike Hildebrandt; Polykarpos Patsalis; Karim El Chilali; Daniel Wendt; Matthias Thielmann; Lars Bergmann; Eva Kottenberg; Marc Schlamann; Holger Eggebrecht; Heinz Jakob; Gerd Heusch; Thomas Konorza; Raimund Erbel
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Optimal timing of aortic valve replacement in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Akira Marumoto; Yoshinobu Nakamura; Yuichiro Kishimoto; Munehiro Saiki; Motonobu Nishimura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Quality of life among patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  M W A van Geldorp; H J Heuvelman; A P Kappetein; J J V Busschbach; D J Cohen; J J M Takkenberg; A J J C Bogers
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 8.  [Decompensated valve failure: the revival of balloon valvuloplasty - percutaneous valve intervention].

Authors:  Stefan Sack; Jochen Menne; Thomas Krüger; Michael Weber; Dieter Müller; Werner Zwehl
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.443

9.  Prolonged intensive care treatment of octogenarians after cardiac surgery: a reasonable economic burden?

Authors:  Heinz Deschka; Romy Schreier; Lemir El-Ayoubi; Stefan Erler; Dirk Müller; Aiman Alken; Gerhard Wimmer-Greinecker
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-05-24

10.  Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis in the elderly: influence of prosthesis-patient mismatch on late survival and left ventricular mass regression.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Kato; Yasushi Tsutsumi; Takahiro Kawai; Tomoyuki Goto; Yosuke Takahashi; Hirokazu Ohashi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-08-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.