| Literature DB >> 17462094 |
Maja Barker1, Ann O'Hanlon, Hannah M McGee, Anne Hickey, Ronan M Conroy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Self-perceptions of aging have been implicated as independent predictors of functional disability and mortality in older adults. In spite of this, research on self-perceptions of aging is limited. One reason for this is the absence of adequate measures. Specifically, there is a need to develop a measure that is theoretically-derived, has good psychometric properties, and is multidimensional in nature. The present research seeks to address this need by adopting the Self-Regulation Model as a framework and using it to develop a comprehensive, multi-dimensional instrument for assessing self-perceptions of aging. This study describes the validation of this newly-developed instrument, the Aging Perceptions Questionnaire (APQ).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17462094 PMCID: PMC1868732 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2318-7-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Geriatr ISSN: 1471-2318 Impact factor: 3.921
Sample Characteristics (n = 2,033)
| Mean Age (years) (SD) | 74.1 (6.8) |
| Gender (%) | |
| Men | 43 |
| Marital status (%) | |
| Married | 44 |
| Widowed | 40 |
| Never married/single | 12 |
| Separated/divorced | 4 |
| Education (%) | |
| Primary school | 60 |
| Secondary school | 33 |
| Third-level (diploma/degree) | 7 |
| Weekly household Income (€)(M ± SD) | 335.70 (190.10) |
| Functional Disability (HAQ-DI) (M ± SD) | 0.50 (0.77) |
| Depression (HADS-D) (M ± SD) | 5.54 (2.85) |
| Comorbidity Index (CMI) | 0.79 (0.95) |
Distributions and Internal Reliability for Subscales of the Aging Perceptions Questionnaire (APQ) (n = 2,033)
| Timeline (chronic) | 5 | 4 | 2.9 (.87) | 2.80 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.86 |
| Timeline (cyclical) | 5 | 4 | 2.7(.82) | 2.60 | 2.4 | 0.2 | 0.89 |
| Consequences positive | 3 | 4 | 3.7 (0.59) | 4.00 | 0.2 | 2.6 | 0.64 |
| Consequences negative | 5 | 4 | 3.4 (.74) | 3.60 | 0.2 | 1.8 | 0.80 |
| Emotional representations | 5 | 4 | 2.4 (.74) | 2.00 | 2.8 | 0.1 | 0.74 |
| Control positive | 5 | 3.60 | 3.80 (.54) | 4.0 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 0.80 |
| Control negative | 4 | 4.00 | 2.65 (0.71) | 2.50 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 0.73 |
| Number of changes experienced | 17 | 17 | 5.44 (3.68) | 5.00 | 6.2 | 0.1 | - |
| Number of changes attributed to aging | 17 | 17 | 3.77 (3.30) | 3.00 | 15.8 | 0.1 | - |
| - | 100 | 65.0 (37.0) | 78.0 | 15.8 | 37.7 | - |
Participant Experience of Health-Related Changes and Attribution of Experienced Changes to Aging (n = 2,033)
| 1) Weight problems | 28.2 | 13.1 |
| 2) Sleep problems | 35.7 | 19.8 |
| 3) Back problems or slipped disc | 29.5 | 14.2 |
| 4) Painful joints | 55.4 | 40.8 |
| 5) Not being mobile | 27.0 | 19.5 |
| 6) Loss of balance | 20.4 | 12.8 |
| 7) Loss of strength | 44.5 | 39.3 |
| 8) Slowing down | 71.0 | 65.4 |
| 9) Cramps | 25.0 | 17.6 |
| 10) Bone or joint conditions | 42.8 | 31.6 |
| 11) Cardiac problems | 24.8 | 13.1 |
| 12) Ear or hearing problems | 25.6 | 18.8 |
| 13) Vision and eyesight changes | 44.4 | 37.4 |
| 14) Respiratory problems | 20.3 | 12.2 |
| 15) Foot problems | 19.3 | 12.2 |
| 16) Depression | 13.9 | 6.6 |
| 17) Anxiety | 16.2 | 7.7 |
Correlations between APQ Dimensions (n = 2,033)
| 1. Identity | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 2. Timeline (chronic) | .14** | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 3. Timeline (cyclical) | .15** | .50** | - | - | - | - | - |
| 4. Consequences positive | .01 | -.07** | -.08** | - | - | - | - |
| 5. Consequences negative | .26** | .55** | .42** | -.09** | - | - | - |
| 6. Control positive | -.10** | -.34** | -.24** | .28** | -.32** | - | - |
| 7. Control negative | -.15** | -.41** | -.32** | .06* | -.53** | .26** | - |
| 8. Emotional representations | .12** | .53** | .65** | -.14** | .44** | -.37** | -.38** |
** = p < .001, * = p < .01
Summary of Hierarchical Regression Analysis Explaining HADS-D Depression Scores (n = 2033)
| Parameter | Standardised regression coefficients | R | R2 | Adjusted R2 | ||
| Model I | Model II | Model III | ||||
| Age | .233** | .095** | .026** | |||
| Gender | -.002 | -.044 | -.036 | |||
| Education | -.085** | -.019 | .007 | |||
| Income | -.028 | -.014 | -.014 | |||
| HAQ-DI | .465** | .324** | ||||
| Co-morbidity Index | .082** | .014 | ||||
| Timeline (acute/chronic) | .106** | |||||
| Timeline (cyclical) | -.010 | |||||
| Emotional representations | .144** | |||||
| Control positive | -.163** | |||||
| Control negative | .004 | |||||
| Consequences positive | -.067** | |||||
| Consequences negative | .117** | |||||
| Identity | .105** |
** = p < .001, * = p < .01
Summary of Hierarchical Regression Analysis Explaining HAQ-DI Disability Scores (n = 2033)
| Parameter | Standardised regression coefficients | R | R2 | Adjusted R2 | ||
| Model I | Model II | Model III | ||||
| Gender | .085** | .074** | .071** | |||
| Age | .296** | .294** | .228** | |||
| Education | -.123** | -.085** | -.053** | |||
| Income | -.027 | -.017 | -.015 | |||
| Co-morbidity | .377** | .276** | ||||
| Timeline (chronic) | .060* | |||||
| Timeline (cyclical) | -.026 | |||||
| Emotional representations | .087** | |||||
| Control positive | -.131** | |||||
| Control negative | -.020 | |||||
| Consequences positive | .001 | |||||
| Consequences negative | .142** | |||||
| Identity | -.033 |
** = p < .001, * = p < .01