Literature DB >> 17461691

Contextual modulation involves suppression and facilitation from the center and the surround.

Tim S Meese1, Robert J Summers, David J Holmes, Stuart A Wallis.   

Abstract

In psychophysics, cross-orientation suppression (XOS) and cross-orientation facilitation (XOF) have been measured by investigating mask configuration on the detection threshold of a centrally placed patch of sine-wave grating. Much of the evidence for XOS and XOF comes from studies using low and high spatial frequencies, respectively, where the interactions are thought to arise from within (XOS) and outside (XOF) the footprint of the classical receptive field. We address the relation between these processes here by measuring the effects of various sizes of superimposed and annular cross-oriented masks on detection thresholds at two spatial scales (1 and 7 c/deg) and on contrast increment thresholds at 7 c/deg. A functional model of our results indicates the following (1) XOS and XOF both occur for superimposed and annular masks. (2) XOS declines with spatial frequency but XOF does not. (3) The spatial extent of the interactions does not scale with spatial frequency, meaning that surround-effects are seen primarily at high spatial frequencies. (4) There are two distinct processes involved in XOS: direct divisive suppression and modulation of self-suppression. (5) Whether XOS or XOF wins out depends upon their relative weights and mask contrast. These results prompt enquiry into the effect of spatial frequency at the single-cell level and place new constraints on image-processing models of early visual processing.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17461691     DOI: 10.1167/7.4.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  18 in total

Review 1.  Lateral effects in pattern vision.

Authors:  John M Foley
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Steady-state contrast response functions provide a sensitive and objective index of amblyopic deficits.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Mathieu Simard; Dave Saint-Amour; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 3.  The divisive normalization model of V1 neurons: a comprehensive comparison of physiological data and model predictions.

Authors:  Tadamasa Sawada; Alexander A Petrov
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Peeling plaids apart: context counteracts cross-orientation contrast masking.

Authors:  Elliot Freeman; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Discriminating natural image statistics from neuronal population codes.

Authors:  Satohiro Tajima; Masato Okada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Multiple components of surround modulation in primary visual cortex: multiple neural circuits with multiple functions?

Authors:  Lauri Nurminen; Alessandra Angelucci
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Adaptation to implied tilt: extensive spatial extrapolation of orientation gradients.

Authors:  Neil W Roach; Ben S Webb
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-19

8.  Fovea-periphery axis symmetry of surround modulation in the human visual system.

Authors:  Lauri Nurminen; Markku Kilpeläinen; Simo Vanni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effect of surrounding blur on foveal visibility.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Sakai; Takayuki Kannon; Shiro Usui
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2007-11-07

10.  Area summation in human vision at and above detection threshold.

Authors:  Tim S Meese; Robert J Summers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.