PURPOSE: To assess whether 18F-dopa PET/CT is able to provide information relevant in changing the clinical management of patients with gastro-enteropancreatic (GEP) tumours where there is negative or inconclusive conventional radiological imaging (ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) and 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2005 to October 2006, 84 patients with clinical and biochemical suspicion of GEP tumours were investigated by US and CT scans, MRI and 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy. In 13/84 (15.4%) both conventional radiological imaging and 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy provided negative or inconclusive findings, and patients were referred for 18F-dopa PET/CT imaging. Each patient received 5.3 MBq x kg(-1) 18F-dopa intravenously, and imaged 60 min later using a hybrid PET/CT scanner. RESULTS: 18F-dopa PET/CT detected the primary tumour in all 13 patients (size range, 7-26 mm, mean, 18 mm; SUVmax range, 2.3-16.3, mean, 5.7) and further 12 unsuspected lesions (size range, 12-23 mm, mean 17; SUVmax range 2.8-12.7, mean 4.6). Confirmation of the PET/CT findings was obtained in all patients from histopathological analysis of tissue obtained after surgery and/or biopsy. All the 18F-dopa-positive primary lesions were confirmed as being the primary tumour at histology, whereas of the other 12 unsuspected 18F-dopa-positive lesions, 11 were found to be metastatic deposits and one due to unspecific inflammation (one false positive result). Notably, the results of 18F-dopa PET/CT imaging changed the clinical management in 11/13 patients (84%). CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary results suggest that 18F-dopa PET/CT has a promising role in GEP patients with negative or inconclusive findings at conventional radiological imaging and 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy. The findings were helpful in biopsy guidance and played a major role in changing the management of those patients.
PURPOSE: To assess whether 18F-dopa PET/CT is able to provide information relevant in changing the clinical management of patients with gastro-enteropancreatic (GEP) tumours where there is negative or inconclusive conventional radiological imaging (ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) and 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2005 to October 2006, 84 patients with clinical and biochemical suspicion of GEP tumours were investigated by US and CT scans, MRI and 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy. In 13/84 (15.4%) both conventional radiological imaging and 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy provided negative or inconclusive findings, and patients were referred for 18F-dopa PET/CT imaging. Each patient received 5.3 MBq x kg(-1) 18F-dopa intravenously, and imaged 60 min later using a hybrid PET/CT scanner. RESULTS:18F-dopa PET/CT detected the primary tumour in all 13 patients (size range, 7-26 mm, mean, 18 mm; SUVmax range, 2.3-16.3, mean, 5.7) and further 12 unsuspected lesions (size range, 12-23 mm, mean 17; SUVmax range 2.8-12.7, mean 4.6). Confirmation of the PET/CT findings was obtained in all patients from histopathological analysis of tissue obtained after surgery and/or biopsy. All the 18F-dopa-positive primary lesions were confirmed as being the primary tumour at histology, whereas of the other 12 unsuspected 18F-dopa-positive lesions, 11 were found to be metastatic deposits and one due to unspecific inflammation (one false positive result). Notably, the results of 18F-dopa PET/CT imaging changed the clinical management in 11/13 patients (84%). CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary results suggest that 18F-dopa PET/CT has a promising role in GEP patients with negative or inconclusive findings at conventional radiological imaging and 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy. The findings were helpful in biopsy guidance and played a major role in changing the management of those patients.
Authors: Patrick Veit-Haibach; Marc Schiesser; Jan Soyka; Klaus Strobel; Niklaus G Schaefer; Rolf Hesselmann; P-A Clavien; Thomas F Hany Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2010-08-15 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: J Arbizu; M Rodriguez-Fraile; I Dominguez-Prado; P Garrastachu; F Rotellar; B Sangro; J A Richter Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2008-06-20 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: R García-Carbonero; F Vilardell; P Jiménez-Fonseca; R González-Campora; E González; M Cuatrecasas; J Capdevila; I Aranda; J Barriuso; X Matías-Guiu Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2013-06-08 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Marina S Zemskova; Bhaskar Gundabolu; Ninet Sinaii; Clara C Chen; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Millie Whatley; Iffat Chowdhury; Ahmed M Gharib; Lynnette K Nieman Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2010-01-20 Impact factor: 5.958