PURPOSE: To determine the effect of visual demand on the nystagmus waveform. Individuals with infantile nystagmus syndrome (INS) commonly report that making an effort to see can intensify their nystagmus and adversely affect vision. However, such an effect has never been confirmed experimentally. METHODS: The eye movement behavior of 11 subjects with INS were recorded at different gaze angles while the subjects viewed visual targets under two conditions: above and then at resolution threshold. Eye movements were recorded by infrared oculography and visual acuity (VA) was measured using Landolt C targets and a two-alternative, forced-choice (2AFC) staircase procedure. Eye movement data were analyzed at the null zone for changes in amplitude, frequency, intensity, and foveation characteristics. Waveform type was also noted under the two conditions. RESULTS: Data from 11 subjects revealed a significant reduction in nystagmus amplitude (P < 0.05), frequency (P < 0.05), and intensity (P < 0.01) when target size was at visual threshold. The percentage of time the eye spent within the low-velocity window (i.e., foveation) significantly increased when target size was at visual threshold (P < 0.05). Furthermore, a change in waveform type with increased visual demand was exhibited by two subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that increased visual demand modifies the nystagmus waveform favorably (and possibly adaptively), producing a significant reduction in nystagmus intensity and prolonged foveation. These findings contradict previous anecdotal reports that visual effort intensifies the nystagmus eye movement at the cost of visual performance. This discrepancy may be attributable to the lack of psychological stress involved in the visual task reported here. This is consistent with the suggestion that it is the visual importance of the task to the individual rather than visual demand per se which exacerbates INS. Further studies are needed to investigate quantitatively the effects of stress and psychological factors on INS waveforms.
PURPOSE: To determine the effect of visual demand on the nystagmus waveform. Individuals with infantile nystagmus syndrome (INS) commonly report that making an effort to see can intensify their nystagmus and adversely affect vision. However, such an effect has never been confirmed experimentally. METHODS: The eye movement behavior of 11 subjects with INS were recorded at different gaze angles while the subjects viewed visual targets under two conditions: above and then at resolution threshold. Eye movements were recorded by infrared oculography and visual acuity (VA) was measured using Landolt C targets and a two-alternative, forced-choice (2AFC) staircase procedure. Eye movement data were analyzed at the null zone for changes in amplitude, frequency, intensity, and foveation characteristics. Waveform type was also noted under the two conditions. RESULTS: Data from 11 subjects revealed a significant reduction in nystagmus amplitude (P < 0.05), frequency (P < 0.05), and intensity (P < 0.01) when target size was at visual threshold. The percentage of time the eye spent within the low-velocity window (i.e., foveation) significantly increased when target size was at visual threshold (P < 0.05). Furthermore, a change in waveform type with increased visual demand was exhibited by two subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that increased visual demand modifies the nystagmus waveform favorably (and possibly adaptively), producing a significant reduction in nystagmus intensity and prolonged foveation. These findings contradict previous anecdotal reports that visual effort intensifies the nystagmus eye movement at the cost of visual performance. This discrepancy may be attributable to the lack of psychological stress involved in the visual task reported here. This is consistent with the suggestion that it is the visual importance of the task to the individual rather than visual demand per se which exacerbates INS. Further studies are needed to investigate quantitatively the effects of stress and psychological factors on INS waveforms.
Authors: Artur V Cideciyan; Geoffrey K Aguirre; Samuel G Jacobson; Omar H Butt; Sharon B Schwartz; Malgorzata Swider; Alejandro J Roman; Sam Sadigh; William W Hauswirth Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-12-23 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: James J Harrison; Petroc Sumner; Matt J Dunn; Jonathan T Erichsen; Tom C A Freeman Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-02-10 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Xunda Luo; Artur V Cideciyan; Alessandro Iannaccone; Alejandro J Roman; Lauren C Ditta; Barbara J Jennings; Svetlana A Yatsenko; Rebecca Sheplock; Alexander Sumaroka; Malgorzata Swider; Sharon B Schwartz; Bernd Wissinger; Susanne Kohl; Samuel G Jacobson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Matt J Dunn; Christopher M Harris; Fergal A Ennis; Tom H Margrain; J Margaret Woodhouse; Lee McIlreavy; Jonathan T Erichsen Journal: Behav Res Methods Date: 2019-10