Literature DB >> 17460158

Naproxen and celecoxib do not prevent AD in early results from a randomized controlled trial.

C G Lyketsos, J C S Breitner, R C Green, B K Martin, C Meinert, S Piantadosi, M Sabbagh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of naproxen and celecoxib for the primary prevention of Alzheimer disease (AD).
METHODS: Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked clinical trial conducted at six US dementia research clinics. Volunteers aged 70+ years, with cognitive screening scores above designated cut-offs and a family history of AD, were randomly assigned to celecoxib 200 mg BID, naproxen sodium 220 mg BID, or placebo. Enrollment began in early 2001. The main outcome measure was diagnosis of AD after randomization.
RESULTS: On December 17, 2004, treatments were suspended. Events while on treatment yielded hazard ratios vs placebo of 1.99 (95% CI 0.80 to 4.97; p = 0.14) for celecoxib and 2.35 (0.95 to 5.77; p = 0.06) for naproxen. Imperfect screening measures led to enrollment of 7 individuals with dementia and 46 others with milder cognitive syndromes. Their (prevalent) illness was detected at enrollment and diagnosed within 6 months following randomization. Secondary analyses that excluded the 7 cases of prevalent dementia showed increased hazard ratios for AD with both treatments. Neither treatment produced a notable effect on the incidence of milder cognitive syndromes.
CONCLUSIONS: These results do not support the hypothesis that celecoxib or naproxen prevent Alzheimer dementia, at least within the early years after initiation of treatment. Masked long-term follow-up of these participants will be essential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17460158     DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000260269.93245.d2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  141 in total

Review 1.  Current therapeutic targets for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Joshua D Grill; Jeffrey L Cummings
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.618

Review 2.  Targeting cyclooxygenases-1 and -2 in neuroinflammation: Therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Saba Aïd; Francesca Bosetti
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 4.079

Review 3.  Targeting cyclooxygenase-2 in depression is not a viable therapeutic approach and may even aggravate the pathophysiology underpinning depression.

Authors:  Michael Maes
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 3.584

Review 4.  Amyloid-modifying therapies for Alzheimer's disease: therapeutic progress and its implications.

Authors:  Meaghan C Creed; Norton W Milgram
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2010-04-20

5.  Analysing Time to Event Data in Dementia Prevention Trials: The Example of the GuidAge Study of EGb761.

Authors:  B Scherrer; S Andrieu; P J Ousset; G Berrut; J F Dartigues; B Dubois; F Pasquier; F Piette; P Robert; J Touchon; P Garnier; H Mathiex-Fortunet; B Vellas
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.075

Review 6.  Inflammation in Alzheimer's disease: Lessons learned from microglia-depletion models.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Spangenberg; Kim N Green
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 7.217

Review 7.  Therapeutic implications of the prostaglandin pathway in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Eiron Cudaback; Nikolas L Jorstad; Yue Yang; Thomas J Montine; C Dirk Keene
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 8.  Primary and Secondary Prevention Trials in Alzheimer Disease: Looking Back, Moving Forward.

Authors:  David Hsu; Gad A Marshall
Journal:  Curr Alzheimer Res       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 9.  Why do so many drugs for Alzheimer's disease fail in development? Time for new methods and new practices?

Authors:  Robert E Becker; Nigel H Greig; Ezio Giacobini
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.472

10.  Cognitive dysfunction with aging and the role of inflammation.

Authors:  Arthur A Simen; Kelly A Bordner; Mark P Martin; Lawrence A Moy; Lisa C Barry
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.091

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.