Literature DB >> 17460104

Divided attention impairs human motor adaptation but not feedback control.

Jordan A Taylor1, Kurt A Thoroughman.   

Abstract

When humans experience externally induced errors in a movement, the motor system's feedback control compensates for those errors within the movement. The motor system's predictive control then uses information about those errors to inform future movements. The role of attention in these two distinct motor processes is unclear. Previous experiments have revealed a role for attention in motor learning over the course of many movements; however, these experimental paradigms do not determine how attention influences within-movement feedback control versus across-movement adaptation. Here we develop a dual-task paradigm, consisting of movement and audio tasks, which can differentiate and expose attention's role in these two processes of motor control. Over the course of several days, subjects performed horizontal reaching movements, with and without the audio task; movements were occasionally subjected to transient force perturbations. On movements with a force perturbation, subjects compensated for the force-induced movement errors, and on movements immediately after the force perturbation subjects exhibited adaptation. On every movement trial, subjects performed a two-tone frequency-discrimination task. The temporal specificity of the frequency-discrimination task allowed us to divide attention within and across movements. We find that divided attention did not impair the within-movement feedback control of the arm, but did reduce subsequent movement adaptation. We suggest that the secondary task interfered with the encoding and transformation of errors into changes in predictive control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17460104     DOI: 10.1152/jn.01070.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  55 in total

1.  Visual, motor and attentional influences on proprioceptive contributions to perception of hand path rectilinearity during reaching.

Authors:  Robert A Scheidt; Kyle P Lillis; Scott J Emerson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Substituting auditory for visual feedback to adapt to altered dynamic and kinematic environments during reaching.

Authors:  Fabio Oscari; Riccardo Secoli; Federico Avanzini; Giulio Rosati; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  A shared resource between declarative memory and motor memory.

Authors:  Aysha Keisler; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The effects of secondary task interference on shape reproduction.

Authors:  Blake Cameron Wesley Martin; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  A spatial explicit strategy reduces error but interferes with sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Bryan L Benson; Joaquin A Anguera; Rachael D Seidler
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Encoding attentional states during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Hee Yeon Im; Patrick Bédard; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Flexible explicit but rigid implicit learning in a visuomotor adaptation task.

Authors:  Krista M Bond; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Age and Cognitive Stress Influences Motor Skill Acquisition, Consolidation, and Dual-Task Effect in Humans.

Authors:  Keith R Cole; Richard K Shields
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 1.328

9.  Explicit and implicit contributions to learning in a sensorimotor adaptation task.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; John W Krakauer; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  An explicit strategy prevails when the cerebellum fails to compute movement errors.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; Nola M Klemfuss; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.