Literature DB >> 17459832

A prospective, case control study evaluating the association between Clostridium difficile toxins in the colon of neonatal swine and gross and microscopic lesions.

Michael J Yaeger1, Joann M Kinyon, J Glenn Songer.   

Abstract

Clostridium difficile infection in swine has most often been described in suckling pigs, where it has been associated with mesocolonic edema and typhlocolitis. This prospective study was designed to assess the correlation between the presence of C. difficile toxins (TCd) in the colon contents of neonatal pigs and a number of parameters, including gross evidence of diarrhea, mesocoloninc edema, typhlitis, and colitis. C. difficile was isolated from 51% (66/129) of large intestines and TCd was detected in the colon contents of 50% (65/129) of the piglets. Fifty-eight percent (38/65) of TCd-positive piglets had normal to pelleted colon and rectal contents, whereas 75% (48/64) of TCd-negative pigs had gross evidence of diarrhea. Clostridium difficile toxin-positive animals were significantly more likely to have normal to pelleted feces. Edema of the mesocolon was observed in 38/65 (59%) of TCd-positive piglets. Because a high number of TCd-positive piglets (41%) lacked edema of the mesocolon and a high number of TCd-negative pigs had mesocolonic edema (51%), a statistically significant association between TCd and mesocolonic edema was not identified. Seventy-five percent (49/65) of TCd-positive piglets had colitis and 47/65 (72%) had typhlitis. The association between TCd and both colitis and typhlitis was statistically significant. Apparently healthy piglets were obtained from 5 separate sites. Because TCd was detected in the colon contents of 23/29 (79%) apparently healthy piglets obtained from 5 separate sites, and 70% of TCd-positive control pigs had colitis, C. difficile may represent an important subclinical issue in neonatal swine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17459832     DOI: 10.1177/104063870701900108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest        ISSN: 1040-6387            Impact factor:   1.279


  17 in total

Review 1.  Clostridium difficile in the ICU: the struggle continues.

Authors:  Linda D Bobo; Erik R Dubberke; Marin Kollef
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 2.  Clostridium difficile in Food and Animals: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  C Rodriguez; B Taminiau; J Van Broeck; M Delmée; G Daube
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  A retrospective study on the etiological diagnoses of diarrhea in neonatal piglets in Ontario, Canada, between 2001 and 2010.

Authors:  Gloria Chan; Abdolvahab Farzan; Josepha DeLay; Beverly McEwen; John F Prescott; Robert M Friendship
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.310

4.  Laboratory detection of Clostridium difficile in piglets in Australia.

Authors:  Daniel R Knight; Michele M Squire; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of four different diagnostic tests to detect Clostridium difficile in piglets.

Authors:  E C Keessen; N E M Hopman; L A M G van Leengoed; A J A M van Asten; C Hermanus; E J Kuijper; L J A Lipman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  The ecology and pathobiology of Clostridium difficile infections: an interdisciplinary challenge.

Authors:  E R Dubberke; D B Haslam; C Lanzas; L D Bobo; C-A D Burnham; Y T Gröhn; P I Tarr
Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 2.702

Review 7.  Models for the study of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Emma L Best; Jane Freeman; Mark H Wilcox
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2012-03-01

8.  Clostridium difficile and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus shedding by slaughter-age pigs.

Authors:  J Scott Weese; Joyce Rousseau; Anne Deckert; Sheryl Gow; Richard J Reid-Smith
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 9.  Clostridium (Clostridioides) difficile in animals.

Authors:  J Scott Weese
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 1.279

10.  Bacterial probiotics as an aid in the control of Clostridium difficile disease in neonatal pigs.

Authors:  Paulo H E Arruda; Darin M Madson; Alejandro Ramirez; Eric W Rowe; J Glenn Songer
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.008

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.