Literature DB >> 17459783

A randomized trial of PET scanning to improve diagnostic yield of direct laryngoscopy in patients with suspicion of recurrent laryngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy.

Remco de Bree1, Lisa van der Putten, Otto S Hoekstra, Dirk J Kuik, Carin A Uyl-de Groot, Harm van Tinteren, C René Leemans, Maarten Boers.   

Abstract

The RELAPS study (REcurrent LAryngeal carcinoma PET Study) was designed to determine whether FDG-PET is of value in the selection of patients for direct laryngoscopy under general anesthesia in patients with suspicion of recurrent laryngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy. In a randomized controlled clinical trial the current diagnostic practice, i.e. all patients undergo direct laryngoscopy, will be compared to a strategy in which FDG-PET selects the patients for laryngoscopy. All eight head and neck cancer centers of the Dutch Head and Neck Oncology Cooperative Group NWHHT will participate in this multicenter trial. The study population consists of patients with clinical suspicion of recurrent T2-T4 laryngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy (without obvious signs of tumor) in whom a direct laryngoscopy under general anesthesia with taking of biopsies is indicated by the local physician. The primary efficacy endpoint is the difference in the number of futile indications for direct laryngoscopy between the conventional diagnostic arm and the FDG-PET based diagnostic arm. An indication for laryngoscopy is classified as futile if this laryngoscopy was negative and no recurrence was diagnosed within 6 months follow-up (gold standard). The FDG-PET based strategy may increase the risk of missing recurrent tumor compared to current practice. Safety endpoints include survival and morbidity due to laryngoscopy with taking of biopsies. Survival rates of both groups will have to be collected outside the time frame of the funded trial. Resectability of recurrent tumor and tumor negative surgical margins after total laryngectomy will be used as proxy endpoints. The trial will also compare quality of life and direct medical costs between both arms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17459783     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2007.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  6 in total

1.  Which is the most reliable diagnostic modality for detecting locally residual or recurrent laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma after (chemo)radiotherapy?

Authors:  Peter Zbären; Remco de Bree; Robert P Takes; Alessandra Rinaldo; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Test-treatment RCTs are susceptible to bias: a review of the methodological quality of randomized trials that evaluate diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano; Jacqueline Dinnes; Alice J Sitch; Chris Hyde; Jonathan J Deeks
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  Is C-11 Methionine PET an alternative to 18-F FDG-PET for identifying recurrent laryngeal cancer after radiotherapy?

Authors:  Jan Wedman; Jan Pruim; Lisa van der Putten; Otto S Hoekstra; Remco de Bree; Boukje A C van Dijk; Bernard F A M van der Laan
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-11-18       Impact factor: 2.597

4.  The cost-effectiveness of 18FDG-PET in selecting patients with suspicion of recurrent laryngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy for direct laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Addy C G van Hooren; Jolijn Brouwer; Remco de Bree; Otto S Hoekstra; C René Leemans; Carin A Uyl-de Groot
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-11-29       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Should fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography be the first-line imaging investigation for restaging the laryngeal carcinoma patients?

Authors:  Tarun Kumar Jain; Guman Singh; Sumit Goyal; Ajay Yadav; Dinesh Yadav; Nitin Khunteta; Hemant Malhotra
Journal:  World J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-02-12

6.  2-Deoxy-2[F-18]FDG-PET for detection of recurrent laryngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy: interobserver variability in reporting.

Authors:  L van der Putten; O S Hoekstra; R de Bree; D J Kuik; E F I Comans; J A Langendijk; C R Leemans
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 3.488

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.