PURPOSE: To study the impact on nodal coverage and dose to fixed organs at risk when using daily fiducial localization of the prostate to deliver intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Five patients with prostate cancer in whom prostate and pelvic nodes were irradiated with IMRT were studied. Dose was prescribed such that 95% of the prostate planning target volume (PTV) and 90% of the nodal PTV were covered. Random and systematic prostate displacements in the anterior-posterior, superior-inferior, and left-right directions were simulated to shift the original isocenter of the IMRT plan. The composite dose during the course of treatment was calculated. RESULTS: Compared with a static setup, simulating random shifts reduced dose by less than 1.5% for nodal hotspot (i.e., dose to 1 cm(3)), by less than 1% for the 90% nodal PTV coverage, and by less than 0.5% for the nodal mean dose. Bowel and femoral head hotspots were reduced by less than 1.5% and 2%, respectively. A 10-mm systematic offset reduced nodal coverage by up to 10%. CONCLUSION: The use of prostate fiducials for daily localization during IMRT treatment results in negligible changes in dose coverage of pelvic nodes or normal tissue sparing in the absence of a significant systematic offset. This offers a simple and practical solution to the problem of image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer when including pelvic nodes.
PURPOSE: To study the impact on nodal coverage and dose to fixed organs at risk when using daily fiducial localization of the prostate to deliver intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Five patients with prostate cancer in whom prostate and pelvic nodes were irradiated with IMRT were studied. Dose was prescribed such that 95% of the prostate planning target volume (PTV) and 90% of the nodal PTV were covered. Random and systematic prostate displacements in the anterior-posterior, superior-inferior, and left-right directions were simulated to shift the original isocenter of the IMRT plan. The composite dose during the course of treatment was calculated. RESULTS: Compared with a static setup, simulating random shifts reduced dose by less than 1.5% for nodal hotspot (i.e., dose to 1 cm(3)), by less than 1% for the 90% nodal PTV coverage, and by less than 0.5% for the nodal mean dose. Bowel and femoral head hotspots were reduced by less than 1.5% and 2%, respectively. A 10-mm systematic offset reduced nodal coverage by up to 10%. CONCLUSION: The use of prostate fiducials for daily localization during IMRT treatment results in negligible changes in dose coverage of pelvic nodes or normal tissue sparing in the absence of a significant systematic offset. This offers a simple and practical solution to the problem of image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer when including pelvic nodes.
Authors: Paul J Keall; Doan Trang Nguyen; Ricky O'Brien; Pengpeng Zhang; Laura Happersett; Jenny Bertholet; Per R Poulsen Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2018-04-14 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Jessie Y Huang; Wayne D Newhauser; X Ronald Zhu; Andrew K Lee; Rajat J Kudchadker Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2011-07-28 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Dominique C van Rooijen; René Pool; Jeroen B van de Kamer; Maarten C C M Hulshof; Caro C E Koning; Arjan Bel Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2010-06-15 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Amar U Kishan; Marguerite Tyran; Julius Weng; Shrinivasa Upadhyaya; James Lamb; Michael Steinberg; Christopher King; Minsong Cao Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2019-04-03 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Annelise Giebeler; Jonas Fontenot; Peter Balter; George Ciangaru; Ronald Zhu; Wayne Newhauser Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 2.102