Literature DB >> 17459494

Non-photic phase resetting of Dexras1 deficient mice: a more complicated story.

R Dallmann1, N Mrosovsky.   

Abstract

Recently, it has been reported that mice deficient for Dexras1 have a diminished phase-shifting response to photic stimuli but an enhanced response to non-photic stimuli; the latter is of additional interest in that mice generally show relatively weak and unreliable responses to non-photic events. Therefore, in situations in which both photic and non-photic stimuli are present, control of circadian rhythms, relative to wild-types, should tip toward non-photic stimuli in Dexras1(-/-) mice. However, we detected no differences in an experiment in which photic and non-photic entraining agents were presented 180 degrees out of phase, i.e. were in conflict with each other. Furthermore, Dexras1(-/-) and wild-type mice did not differ in non-photic phase shifting to a pulse of confinement in a novel running wheel. Suppression of locomotion by light (masking effect) did not differ between the genotypes, indicating that the photoreceptor input to the non-image forming system is intact. The circadian phenotype of Dexras1(-/-) mice appears to be more complicated than previously thought.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17459494     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  2 in total

1.  Circadian abnormalities in mouse models of Smith-Magenis syndrome: evidence for involvement of RAI1.

Authors:  Melanie Lacaria; Wenli Gu; James R Lupski
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 2.  Small G Proteins Dexras1 and RHES and Their Role in Pathophysiological Processes.

Authors:  Ashish Thapliyal; Rashmi Verma; Navin Kumar
Journal:  Int J Cell Biol       Date:  2014-03-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.