J Young1, A I Gilbert, M F Graham. 1. Hernia Institute of Florida, 6200 Sunset Drive, Miami, FL 33143, USA. jerrold.young@gmail.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of abdominal wall hernias is not always straightforward and may require additional investigative modalities. Real-time ultrasound is accurate, non-invasive, relatively inexpensive, and readily available. The value of ultrasound as an adjunctive tool in the diagnosis of abdominal wall hernias in both pre-operative and post-operative patients was studied. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of 200 patients treated at the Hernia Institute of Florida was carried out. In these cases, ultrasound had been used to assist with case management. Patients without previous hernia surgery and those with early and late post-herniorrhaphy complaints were studied. Patients with obvious hernias were excluded. Indications for ultrasound examination included patients with abdominal pain without a palpable hernia, a palpable mass of questionable etiology, and patients with inordinate pain or excessive swelling during the early post-operative period. Patients were treated with surgery or conservative therapy depending on the results of the physical examination and ultrasound studies. Cases in which the ultrasound findings influenced the decision-making process by confirming clinical findings or altering the diagnosis and changing the treatment plan are discussed. RESULTS: Of the 200 patients, 144 complained of pain alone and on physical exam no hernia or mass was palpable. Of these 144 patients with pain alone, 21 had a hernia identified on the US examination and were referred for surgery. The 108 that had a negative ultrasound were treated conservatively with rest, heat, and anti-inflammatory drugs, most often with excellent results. Of the 56 remaining patients who had a mass, with or without pain, 22 had hernias identified by means of ultrasound examination. In the other 34, the etiology of the mass was not a hernia. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal wall ultrasound is a valuable tool in the scheme of management of patients in whom the diagnosis of abdominal wall hernia is unclear. Therapeutic decisions can be influenced by the ultrasound findings that can provide more efficient and economical treatment by expediting their clinical management.
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of abdominal wall hernias is not always straightforward and may require additional investigative modalities. Real-time ultrasound is accurate, non-invasive, relatively inexpensive, and readily available. The value of ultrasound as an adjunctive tool in the diagnosis of abdominal wall hernias in both pre-operative and post-operative patients was studied. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of 200 patients treated at the Hernia Institute of Florida was carried out. In these cases, ultrasound had been used to assist with case management. Patients without previous hernia surgery and those with early and late post-herniorrhaphy complaints were studied. Patients with obvious hernias were excluded. Indications for ultrasound examination included patients with abdominal pain without a palpable hernia, a palpable mass of questionable etiology, and patients with inordinate pain or excessive swelling during the early post-operative period. Patients were treated with surgery or conservative therapy depending on the results of the physical examination and ultrasound studies. Cases in which the ultrasound findings influenced the decision-making process by confirming clinical findings or altering the diagnosis and changing the treatment plan are discussed. RESULTS: Of the 200 patients, 144 complained of pain alone and on physical exam no hernia or mass was palpable. Of these 144 patients with pain alone, 21 had a hernia identified on the US examination and were referred for surgery. The 108 that had a negative ultrasound were treated conservatively with rest, heat, and anti-inflammatory drugs, most often with excellent results. Of the 56 remaining patients who had a mass, with or without pain, 22 had hernias identified by means of ultrasound examination. In the other 34, the etiology of the mass was not a hernia. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal wall ultrasound is a valuable tool in the scheme of management of patients in whom the diagnosis of abdominal wall hernia is unclear. Therapeutic decisions can be influenced by the ultrasound findings that can provide more efficient and economical treatment by expediting their clinical management.
Authors: C V van Hessen; M M Roos; F B M Sanders; E J M M Verleisdonk; G J Clevers; P H P Davids; J P J Burgmans Journal: Hernia Date: 2019-09-03 Impact factor: 4.739
Authors: F E Muysoms; S A Antoniou; K Bury; G Campanelli; J Conze; D Cuccurullo; A C de Beaux; E B Deerenberg; B East; R H Fortelny; J-F Gillion; N A Henriksen; L Israelsson; A Jairam; A Jänes; J Jeekel; M López-Cano; M Miserez; S Morales-Conde; D L Sanders; M P Simons; M Śmietański; L Venclauskas; F Berrevoet Journal: Hernia Date: 2015-01-25 Impact factor: 4.739
Authors: M M Roos; C V van Hessen; E J M M Verleisdonk; G J Clevers; P H P Davids; C E H Voorbrood; R K J Simmermacher; J P J Burgmans Journal: Hernia Date: 2018-09-22 Impact factor: 4.739