Literature DB >> 17458562

Markov-modeling for the administration of platinum analogues and paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy as well as topotecan and liposomal doxorubicin as second-line chemotherapy with epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

M Fedders1, M Hartmann, A Schneider, R Kath, O Camara, H Oelschläger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: So far there is no analysis available on the cost effectiveness of the paclitaxel/platinum-analogue combination versus carboplatin monotherapy with ovarian cancer. Up-to-now only a cost-utility analysis on ovarian carcinoma has been published (Ortega et al. in Gynecol Oncol 66(3):454-463, 1997), which in addition to the first-line chemotherapy included second-line chemotherapy with effectiveness and cost data in the analysis. Therefore, within the scope of our study the cost effectiveness of platinum analogues and paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy as well as topotecan and liposomal doxorubicin as second-lie chemotherapy was to be determined with epithelial ovarian carcinoma.
METHODS: For this purpose a decision-making Markov model was developed which represents the medical and economic consequences of the administration of paclitaxel and platinum derivatives in first-line chemotherapy and the administration of topotecan and liposomal doxorubicin in second-line chemotherapy in the treatment of epithelial ovarian carcinoma by means of data from the literature. Patients were treated either in the early (FIGO stage I-IIa) or advanced stage (FIGO stage IIb-IV).
RESULTS: The therapeutic strategy caboplatin followed by topotecan costs 20,123.91 euros, the therapeutic strategy carboplatin followed by liposomal doxorubicin 22,336.57 euros, the therapeutic strategy carboplatin/pactlitaxel followed by liposomal topotecan 29,820.64 euros and the therapeutic strategy carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by liposomal doxorubicin 31,560.47 euros from the time of diagnosis until death or survival within 5 years. With lives saved, accordingly of 2.55, 2.70, 2.60 and 2.65 years' costs amounted to 7,891 euros, 8,270.35 euros, and 11,453.62 euros per year of life saved.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the threshold value of social willingness to pay 45,500 euros per year of life saved, the therapeutic strategy carboplatin followed by topotecan, the therapeutic strategy carboplatin followed by liposomal doxorubicin, the therapeutic strategy carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by topotcan and the therapeutic strategy carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by liposomal doxorubicin can be evaluated to be cost effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17458562     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-007-0210-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  13 in total

1.  Phase III randomized study of cisplatin versus paclitaxel versus cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with suboptimal stage III or IV ovarian cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study.

Authors:  F M Muggia; P S Braly; M F Brady; G Sutton; T H Niemann; S L Lentz; R D Alvarez; P R Kucera; J M Small
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Topotecan versus paclitaxel for the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  W ten Bokkel Huinink; M Gore; J Carmichael; A Gordon; J Malfetano; I Hudson; C Broom; C Scarabelli; N Davidson; M Spanczynski; G Bolis; H Malmström; R Coleman; S C Fields; J F Heron
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  First line chemotherapy with carboplatin plus paclitaxel in advanced ovarian cancer--a new standard of care?

Authors:  A du Bois; J P Neijt; J T Thigpen
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Markov models in medical decision making: a practical guide.

Authors:  F A Sonnenberg; J R Beck
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1993 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Users' guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. B. What were the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; D L Sackett; D J Cook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-01-05       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Randomized intergroup trial of cisplatin-paclitaxel versus cisplatin-cyclophosphamide in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: three-year results.

Authors:  M J Piccart; K Bertelsen; K James; J Cassidy; C Mangioni; E Simonsen; G Stuart; S Kaye; I Vergote; R Blom; R Grimshaw; R J Atkinson; K D Swenerton; C Trope; M Nardi; J Kaern; S Tumolo; P Timmers; J A Roy; F Lhoas; B Lindvall; M Bacon; A Birt; J E Andersen; B Zee; J Paul; B Baron; S Pecorelli
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-05-03       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a randomized phase III study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus topotecan.

Authors:  A N Gordon; J T Fleagle; D Guthrie; D E Parkin; M E Gore; A J Lacave
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Phase II study of liposomal doxorubicin in platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  A N Gordon; C O Granai; P G Rose; J Hainsworth; A Lopez; C Weissman; R Rosales; T Sharpington
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus standard chemotherapy with either single-agent carboplatin or cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in women with ovarian cancer: the ICON3 randomised trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-08-17       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer.

Authors:  W P McGuire; W J Hoskins; M F Brady; P R Kucera; E E Partridge; K Y Look; D L Clarke-Pearson; M Davidson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-01-04       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Cost Effectiveness of Chemotherapeutic Agents and Targeted Biologics in Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Insiya B Poonawalla; Rohan C Parikh; Xianglin L Du; Helena M VonVille; David R Lairson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.981

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.