Literature DB >> 17457870

3T MR of the prostate: reducing susceptibility gradients by inflating the endorectal coil with a barium sulfate suspension.

Yael Rosen1, B Nicolas Bloch, Robert E Lenkinski, Robert L Greenman, Robert P Marquis, Neil M Rofsky.   

Abstract

Most prostate MRI/MRS examinations are performed with an endorectal coil inflated with air, leading to an air-tissue interface that induces magnetic susceptibility gradients within the gland. Inflation of the coil with a barium sulfate suspension is described and compared to inflation with air or liquid perfluorocarbon (PFC). The B(0) field in the prostate gland was mapped for five healthy volunteers when the endorectal coil was inflated with each of the three agents. A marked decrease in the posterior-anterior (P-A) field gradient and a significant improvement in field homogeneity were evident in the presence of a barium suspension and PFC relative to air. MRS data acquired from the prostate gland in the presence of air, PFC, and a barium suspension in the endorectal coil showed similar trends, demonstrating improvement in line-widths and spectral resolution when the barium suspension or the PFC were inflating the endorectal coil. On this basis we conclude that a barium suspension provides an available, cheap, and safe alternative to PFC, and we suggest that inflating the endorectal coil with a barium suspension should be considered for prostate MR studies, especially at high field strengths (such as 3T). (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17457870     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  20 in total

1.  Prediction of prostate cancer extracapsular extension with high spatial resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced 3-T MRI.

Authors:  B Nicolas Bloch; Elizabeth M Genega; Daniel N Costa; Ivan Pedrosa; Martin P Smith; Herbert Y Kressel; Long Ngo; Martin G Sanda; William C Dewolf; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Automated computer-derived prostate volumes from MR imaging data: comparison with radiologist-derived MR imaging and pathologic specimen volumes.

Authors:  Julie C Bulman; Robert Toth; Amish D Patel; B Nicolas Bloch; Colm J McMahon; Long Ngo; Anant Madabhushi; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  A clinical comparison of rigid and inflatable endorectal-coil probes for MRI and 3D MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) of the prostate.

Authors:  Susan M Noworolski; Jason C Crane; Daniel B Vigneron; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  A mask method to assess the uniformity of fat suppression in phantom studies.

Authors:  Yasuo Takatsu; Masafumi Nakamura; Kenichiro Yamamura; Satoshi Sawa; Masaki Asahara; Michitaka Honda; Tosiaki Miyati
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2019-08-17

5.  Segmented diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate: Application to transperineal in-bore 3T MR image-guided targeted biopsy.

Authors:  Andriy Fedorov; Kemal Tuncali; Lawrence P Panych; Janice Fairhurst; Elmira Hassanzadeh; Ravi T Seethamraju; Clare M Tempany; Stephan E Maier
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Pyrolytic graphite foam: a passive magnetic susceptibility matching material.

Authors:  Gary C Lee; Patrick W Goodwill; Kevin Phuong; Ben A Inglis; Greig C Scott; Brian A Hargreaves; Lizabeth Li; Alex C Chen; Rachana N Shah; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Effect of age on the fractional anisotropy (FA) value of peripheral nerves and clinical significance of the age-corrected FA value for evaluating polyneuropathies.

Authors:  Keizo Tanitame; Yoshiko Iwakado; Yuji Akiyama; Hiroki Ueno; Kazuhide Ochi; Keiko Otani; Miyuki Takasu; Shuji Date; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prostate cancer imaging and staging at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) approach.

Authors:  B Nicolas Bloch; Robert E Lenkinski; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.388

Review 9.  Role of Multiparametric MR Imaging in Malignancies of the Urogenital Tract.

Authors:  Alberto Diaz de Leon; Daniel Costa; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 10.  Multiparametric MRI of prostate cancer: an update on state-of-the-art techniques and their performance in detecting and localizing prostate cancer.

Authors:  John V Hegde; Robert V Mulkern; Lawrence P Panych; Fiona M Fennessy; Andriy Fedorov; Stephan E Maier; Clare M C Tempany
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.