Literature DB >> 17457601

Voice in early glottic cancer compared to benign voice pathology.

C D L Van Gogh1, H F Mahieu, D J Kuik, R N P M Rinkel, J A Langendijk, I M Verdonck-de Leeuw.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare (Dutch) Voice Handicap Index (VHIvumc) scores from a selected group of patients with voice problems after treatment for early glottic cancer with patients with benign voice disorders and subjects from the normal population. The study included a group of 35 patients with voice problems after treatment for early glottic cancer and a group of 197 patients with benign voice disorders. Furthermore, VHI scores were collected from 123 subjects randomly chosen from the normal population. VHI reliability was high with high internal consistency and test-retest stability. VHI scores of glottic cancer patients were similar to those of patients with voice problems due to benign lesions. Both groups of patients were clearly deviant from the normal population. Within the normal population, 16% appeared to have not-normal voices. Based on ROC curves a cut-off score of 15 points was defined to identify patients with voice problems in daily life. A clinical relevant difference score of 10 points was defined to be used for individual patients and of 15 points to be used in study designs with groups. Patients with voice problems after treatment for early glottic cancer encounter the same amount of problems in daily life as the other voice-impaired patients. The VHI proved to be an adequate tool for baseline and effectiveness measurement of voice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17457601     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-007-0313-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  24 in total

1.  The efficacy of voice therapy in patients after treatment for early glottic carcinoma.

Authors:  Christine D L van Gogh; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Brigitte A Boon-Kamma; Rico N P M Rinkel; M Diana de Bruin; Johannes A Langendijk; Dirk J Kuik; Hans F Mahieu
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Vocal function following radiation for non-laryngeal versus laryngeal tumors of the head and neck.

Authors:  K Fung; J Yoo; H A Leeper; S Hawkins; H Heeneman; P C Doyle; V M Venkatesan
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Quality of life after treatment for early laryngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  S J Stoeckli; M Guidicelli; A Schneider; A Huber; S Schmid
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Outcomes analysis of voice and quality of life in patients with laryngeal cancer.

Authors:  M G Stewart; A Y Chen; C B Stach
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1998-02

5.  Consequences of voice impairment in daily life for patients following radiotherapy for early glottic cancer: voice quality, vocal function, and vocal performance.

Authors:  I M Verdonck-de Leeuw; R B Keus; F J Hilgers; F J Koopmans-van Beinum; A J Greven; J M de Jong; G Vreeburg; H Bartelink
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Voice quality after radiation therapy for early glottic cancer.

Authors:  I Hocevar-Boltezar; M Zargi; I Honocodeevar-Boltezar
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-09

7.  [Determination of subjective impairment in dysphonia. A methodological comparison].

Authors:  S Günther; T Rasch; M Klotz; U Hoppe; U Eysholdt; F Rosanowski
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Objective evaluation of the quality of voice following radiation therapy for T1 glottic cancer.

Authors:  A Aref; J Dworkin; S Devi; L Denton; J Fontanesi
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Development and validation of the voice handicap index-10.

Authors:  Clark A Rosen; Annie S Lee; Jamie Osborne; Thomas Zullo; Thomas Murry
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Quality of life, functional outcome, and costs of early glottic cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan C Smith; Jonas T Johnson; David M Cognetti; Douglas P Landsittel; William E Gooding; Elmer R Cano; Eugene N Myers
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Voice outcomes following radiation versus laser microsurgery for T1 glottic carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matthew T Greulich; Noah P Parker; Philip Lee; Albert L Merati; Stephanie Misono
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Tridimensional assessment of adductor spasmodic dysphonia pre- and post-treatment with Botulinum toxin.

Authors:  P H Dejonckere; K J Neumann; M B J Moerman; J P Martens; A Giordano; C Manfredi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-31       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Voice outcome after unilateral ELS type III or bilateral type II resections for T1-T2 glottic carcinoma: Results after 1 year.

Authors:  Yda van Loon; Martine Hendriksma; Bas J Heijnen; Vivienne A H van de Kamp; Marieke M Hakkesteegt; Stefan Böhringer; Ton P M Langeveld; M A de Jong; W Martin C Klop; Robert J Baatenburg de Jong; Elisabeth V Sjögren
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 3.147

4.  Checking for voice disorders without clinical intervention: The Greek and global VHI thresholds for voice disordered patients.

Authors:  Dionysios Tafiadis; Spyridon K Chronopoulos; Meropi E Helidoni; Evangelia I Kosma; Louiza Voniati; Periklis Papadopoulos; Thomas Murry; Nafsika Ziavra; George A Velegrakis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Bilateral trial vocal fold injection with hyaluronic acid in patients with vocal fold atrophy with or without sulcus.

Authors:  Emke M J M van den Broek; Bas J Heijnen; Martine Hendriksma; Antonius P M Langeveld; Peter Paul G van Benthem; Elisabeth V Sjögren
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Bilateral vocal fold injection with autologous fat in patients with vocal fold atrophy with or without sulcus.

Authors:  Emke M J M van den Broek; Bas J Heijnen; Martine Hendriksma; Vivienne A H van de Kamp-Lam; Antonius P M Langeveld; Peter Paul G van Benthem; Elisabeth V Sjögren
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Superomedial partial arytenoidectomy for voice improvement by correction of posterior glottic insufficiency.

Authors:  Rutger Mahieu; Derrek Heuveling; Hans Mahieu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Voice-related quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Abdul Latif Hamdan; Sahar Farhat; Rami Saadeh; Iyad El-Dahouk; Abla Sibai; Bassem Yamout
Journal:  Autoimmune Dis       Date:  2012-10-02

9.  Bilateral medialization thyroplasty in patients with vocal fold atrophy with or without sulcus.

Authors:  Emke M J M van den Broek; Bas J Heijnen; Martine Hendriksma; Vivienne A H van de Kamp-Lam; Thijs O Verhagen; Antonius P M Langeveld; Peter Paul G van Benthem; Elisabeth V Sjögren
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Patient Self-Assessment and Acoustic Voice Analysis in Screening of Postoperative Vocal Fold Paresis and Paralysis.

Authors:  Maria Heikkinen; Elina Penttilä; Mari Qvarnström; Kimmo Mäkinen; Heikki Löppönen; Jussi M Kärkkäinen
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 2.360

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.