Literature DB >> 17457131

A prospective, randomized comparison between ultrasound and nerve stimulation guidance for multiple injection axillary brachial plexus block.

Andrea Casati1, Giorgio Danelli, Marco Baciarello, Maurizio Corradi, Stefania Leone, Simone Di Cianni, Guido Fanelli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This prospective, randomized, blinded study tested the hypothesis that ultrasound guidance can shorten the onset time of axillary brachial plexus block as compared with nerve stimulation guidance when using a multiple injection technique.
METHODS: Sixty American Society of Anesthesiology physical status I-III patients receiving axillary brachial plexus block with 20 ml ropivacaine, 0.75%, using a multiple injection technique, were randomly allocated to receive either nerve stimulation (group NS, n = 30), or ultrasound guidance (group US, n = 30) for nerve location. A blinded observer recorded the onset of sensory and motor blocks, the need for general anesthesia (failed block) or greater than 100 microg fentanyl (insufficient block) to complete surgery, procedure-related pain, success rate, and patient satisfaction.
RESULTS: The median (range) number of needle passes was 4 (3-8) in group US and 8 (5-13) in group NS (P = 0.002). The onset of sensory block was shorter in group US (14 +/- 6 min) than in group NS (18 +/- 6 min) (P = 0.01), whereas no differences were observed in onset of motor block (24 +/- 8 min in group US and 25 +/- 8 min in group NS; P = 0.33) and readiness to surgery (26 +/- 8 min in group US and 28 +/- 9 min in group NS; P = 0.48). No failed block was reported in either group. Insufficient block was observed in 1 patient (3%) of group US and 2 patients (6%) of group NS (P = 0.61). Procedure-related pain was reported in 6 patients (20%) of group US and 14 patients (48%) of group NS (P = 0.028); patient acceptance was similarly good in the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Multiple injection axillary block with ultrasound guidance provided similar success rates and comparable incidence of complication as compared with nerve stimulation guidance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17457131     DOI: 10.1097/01.anes.0000265159.55179.e1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  40 in total

1.  Letters to the editor.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2011

Review 2.  [Ultrasound-guided anaesthesia of peripheral nerves. The new challenge for anaesthesiologists].

Authors:  J Kessler; P Marhofer; H-J Rapp; M W Hollmann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  Upper extremity regional anesthesia: essentials of our current understanding, 2008.

Authors:  Joseph M Neal; J C Gerancher; James R Hebl; Brian M Ilfeld; Colin J L McCartney; Carlo D Franco; Quinn H Hogan
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.288

4.  The use of train of four monitoring for clinical evaluation of the axillary brachial plexus block.

Authors:  Selda Sen; Sinem Sari; Imran Kurt; Mutlu Cobanoglu
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Evaluation of Ultrasound-guided Genitofemoral Nerve Block Combined with Ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric Nerve Block during Inguinal Hernia Repair in the Elderly.

Authors:  Zhi Huang; Wei Xia; Xiao-Hong Peng; Jin-Yuan Ke; Wei Wang
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2019-10-14

Review 6.  [Ultrasound-guided perivascular axillary brachial plexus block. A simple, effective and efficient procedure].

Authors:  K Pfeiffer; O Weiss; U Krodel; N Hurtienne; J Kloss; D Heuser
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Anatomical basis for ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia at the junction of the axilla and the upper arm.

Authors:  Francis Berthier; Daniel Lepage; Yann Henry; Fabrice Vuillier; Jean-Luc Christophe; Annie Boillot; Emmanuel Samain; Laurent Tatu
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 1.246

8.  [Perivascular brachial plexus block. Ultrasound versus nerve stimulator].

Authors:  T Geiser; D Lang; M Neuburger; B Ott; P Augat; J Büttner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  [Guidance of axillary multiple injection technique for plexus anesthesia. Ultrasound versus nerve stimulation].

Authors:  J T Meierhofer; M Anetseder; N Roewer; C Wunder; U Schwemmer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 1.041

10.  Can we gain an advantage by combining distal median, radial and ulnar nerve blocks with supraclavicular block? A randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Basak Ceyda Meco; Menekse Ozcelik; Derya Gokmen Oztuna; Mehmet Armangil; Cigdem Yildirim Guclu; Sanem Cakar Turhan; Feyhan Okten
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 2.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.