Literature DB >> 17456746

Inter-ring communication allows the GroEL chaperonin complex to distinguish between different substrates.

Esther van Duijn1, Albert J R Heck, Saskia M van der Vies.   

Abstract

The productive folding of substrate proteins by the GroEL complex of Escherichia coli requires the activity of both the chaperonin rings. These heptameric rings were shown to regulate the chaperonins' affinity for substrates and co-chaperonin via inter-ring communications; however, the molecular details of the interactions are not well understood. We have investigated the effect of substrate binding on inter-ring communications of the chaperonin complex, both the double-ring GroEL as well as the single-ring SR1 chaperonin in complex with four different substrates by using mass spectrometry. This approach shows that whereas SR1 is unable to distinguish between Rubisco, gp23, gp5, and MDH, GroEL shows clear differences upon binding these substrates. The most distinctive binding behavior is observed for Rubisco, which only occupies one GroEL ring. Both bacteriophage capsid proteins (gp23 and gp5) as well as MDH are able to bind to the two GroEL rings simultaneously. Our data suggest that inter-ring communication allows the chaperonin complex to differentiate between substrates. Using collision induced dissociation in the gas phase, differences between the chaperonin(substrate) complexes are observed only when both rings are present. The data indicate that the size of the substrate is an important factor that determines the degree of stabilization of the chaperonin complex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17456746      PMCID: PMC2206630          DOI: 10.1110/ps.062713607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  32 in total

1.  Multivalent binding of nonnative substrate proteins by the chaperonin GroEL.

Authors:  G W Farr; K Furtak; M B Rowland; N A Ranson; H R Saibil; T Kirchhausen; A L Horwich
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-03-03       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Purification of GroEL from an overproducing E. coli strain.

Authors:  E Quaite-Randall; A Joachimiak
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2000

3.  The effect of the source pressure on the abundance of ions of noncovalent protein assemblies in an electrospray ionization orthogonal time-of-flight instrument.

Authors:  N Tahallah; M Pinkse; C S Maier; A J Heck
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Domain motions in GroEL upon binding of an oligopeptide.

Authors:  Jimin Wang; Lingling Chen
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-11-28       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 5.  Investigation of intact protein complexes by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Albert J R Heck; Robert H H Van Den Heuvel
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 10.946

Review 6.  Protein folding: importance of the Anfinsen cage.

Authors:  R John Ellis
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-11-11       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  The 13 angstroms structure of a chaperonin GroEL-protein substrate complex by cryo-electron microscopy.

Authors:  Scott Falke; Florence Tama; Charles L Brooks; Edward P Gogol; Mark T Fisher
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Mechanism of GroEL action: productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under GroES.

Authors:  J S Weissman; C M Hohl; O Kovalenko; Y Kashi; S Chen; K Braig; H R Saibil; W A Fenton; A L Horwich
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1995-11-17       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Dissociation of the single-ring chaperonin GroEL by high hydrostatic pressure.

Authors:  Markandeswar Panda; Jesse Ybarra; Paul M Horowitz
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2002-10-22       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Bacteriophage T4 encodes a co-chaperonin that can substitute for Escherichia coli GroES in protein folding.

Authors:  S M van der Vies; A A Gatenby; C Georgopoulos
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  10 in total

1.  How far can we go with structural mass spectrometry of protein complexes?

Authors:  Michal Sharon
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Increased light intensity induces heat shock protein Hsp60 in coral species.

Authors:  Ari M Chow; Christine Ferrier-Pagès; Sam Khalouei; Stéphanie Reynaud; Ian R Brown
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.667

3.  GroEL Mediates Folding of Bacillus anthracis Serine/Threonine Protein Kinase, PrkC.

Authors:  Richa Virmani; Yogendra Singh; Yasha Hasija
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.461

4.  Chaperonin complex with a newly folded protein encapsulated in the folding chamber.

Authors:  D K Clare; P J Bakkes; H van Heerikhuizen; S M van der Vies; H R Saibil
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Analyzing large protein complexes by structural mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Noam Kirshenbaum; Izhak Michaelevski; Michal Sharon
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  A two-domain folding intermediate of RuBisCO in complex with the GroEL chaperonin.

Authors:  Ramanathan Natesh; Daniel K Clare; George W Farr; Arthur L Horwich; Helen R Saibil
Journal:  Int J Biol Macromol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 6.953

7.  Distinct Stabilities of the Structurally Homologous Heptameric Co-Chaperonins GroES and gp31.

Authors:  Andrey Dyachenko; Sem Tamara; Albert J R Heck
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.109

8.  Cryo-EM structures of GroEL:ES2 with RuBisCO visualize molecular contacts of encapsulated substrates in a double-cage chaperonin.

Authors:  Hyunmin Kim; Junsun Park; Seyeon Lim; Sung-Hoon Jun; Mingyu Jung; Soung-Hun Roh
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-12-27

9.  Determining the topology of virus assembly intermediates using ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Tom W Knapman; Victoria L Morton; Nicola J Stonehouse; Peter G Stockley; Alison E Ashcroft
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 10.  ATP-driven molecular chaperone machines.

Authors:  Daniel K Clare; Helen R Saibil
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.505

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.