Literature DB >> 17455293

Effects of motor and sensory nerve transplants on amount and specificity of sciatic nerve regeneration.

Natalia Lago1, Francisco J Rodríguez, Mónica S Guzmán, Jéssica Jaramillo, Xavier Navarro.   

Abstract

Nerve regeneration after complete transection does not allow for adequate functional recovery mainly because of lack of selectivity of target reinnervation. We assessed if transplanting a nerve segment from either motor or sensory origin may improve specifically the accuracy of sensory and motor reinnervation. For this purpose, the rat sciatic nerve was transected and repaired with a silicone guide containing a predegenerated segment of ventral root (VR) or dorsal root (DR), compared to a silicone guide filled with saline. Nerve regeneration and reinnervation was assessed during 3 months by electrophysiologic and functional tests, and by nerve morphology and immunohistochemistry against choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) for labeling motor axons. Functional tests showed that reinnervation was successful in all the rats. However, the two groups with a root allotransplant reached higher degrees of reinnervation in comparison with the control group. Group VR showed the highest reinnervation of muscle targets, whereas Group DR had higher levels of sensory reinnervation than VR and saline groups. The total number of regenerated myelinated fibers was similar in the three groups, but the number of ChAT+ fibers was slightly lower in the VR group in comparison with DR and saline groups. These results indicate that a predegenerated root nerve allotransplant enhances axonal regeneration, leading to faster and higher levels of functional recovery. Although there is not clear preferential reinnervation, regeneration of motor axons is promoted at early times by a motor graft, whereas reinnervation of sensory pathways is increased by a sensory graft. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17455293     DOI: 10.1002/jnr.21286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Res        ISSN: 0360-4012            Impact factor:   4.164


  6 in total

1.  In vivo application of poly-3-hydroxyoctanoate as peripheral nerve graft.

Authors:  D Burcu Hazer; Ercan Bal; Gülay Nurlu; Kemal Benli; Serdar Balci; Feral Öztürk; Baki Hazer
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  FGF-2 low molecular weight selectively promotes neuritogenesis of motor neurons in vitro.

Authors:  Ilary Allodi; Laura Casals-Díaz; Eva Santos-Nogueira; Francisco Gonzalez-Perez; Xavier Navarro; Esther Udina
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2012-12-30       Impact factor: 5.590

3.  Ultraflexible and Stretchable Intrafascicular Peripheral Nerve Recording Device with Axon-Dimension, Cuff-Less Microneedle Electrode Array.

Authors:  Dongxiao Yan; Ahmad A Jiman; Elizabeth C Bottorff; Paras R Patel; Dilara Meli; Elissa J Welle; David C Ratze; Leif A Havton; Cynthia A Chestek; Stephen W P Kemp; Tim M Bruns; Euisik Yoon; John P Seymour
Journal:  Small       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 15.153

4.  Effects of Chitosan-Zinc Oxide Nanocomposite Conduit on Transected Sciatic Nerve: An Animal Model Study.

Authors:  Maryam Iman; Mostafa Araghi; Yunes Panahi; Rahim Mohammadi
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2017-10

5.  Substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide expression in dorsal root ganglia in sciatic nerve injury rats.

Authors:  Changma Fu; Zongsheng Yin; Defu Yu; Zuhua Yang
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 5.135

Review 6.  Schwann Cell Role in Selectivity of Nerve Regeneration.

Authors:  Sara Bolívar; Xavier Navarro; Esther Udina
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-09-20       Impact factor: 6.600

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.