Literature DB >> 17455102

World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for Biological Treatment of Unipolar Depressive Disorders in Primary Care.

Michael Bauer1, Tom Bschor, Andrea Pfennig, Peter C Whybrow, Jules Angst, Marcio Versiani, Hans-Jürgen Möller.   

Abstract

These practical guidelines for the biological treatment of unipolar depressive disorders in primary care settings were developed by an international Task Force of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP). They embody the results of a systematic review of all available clinical and scientific evidence pertaining to the treatment of unipolar depressive disorders and offer practical recommendations for general practitioners encountering patients with these conditions. The guidelines cover disease definition, classification, epidemiology and course of unipolar depressive disorders, and the principles of management in the acute, continuation and maintenance phase. They deal primarily with biological treatment (including antidepressants, other psychopharmacological and hormonal medications, electroconvulsive therapy, light therapy).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17455102     DOI: 10.1080/15622970701227829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Biol Psychiatry        ISSN: 1562-2975            Impact factor:   4.132


  90 in total

Review 1.  Clinically significant drug interactions with newer antidepressants.

Authors:  Edoardo Spina; Gianluca Trifirò; Filippo Caraci
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 5.749

2.  How close is evidence to truth in evidence-based treatment of mental disorders?

Authors:  Hans-Jürgen Möller
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 5.270

3.  [S3 guidelines on unipolar depression].

Authors:  M Bauer
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 4.  Management of depression in adults.

Authors:  Markku Timonen; Timo Liukkonen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-02-23

5.  Isn't the efficacy of antidepressants clinically relevant? A critical comment on the results of the metaanalysis by Kirsch et al. 2008.

Authors:  Hans Jürgen Möller
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 5.270

6.  Primary care physicians' and psychiatrists' approaches to treating mild depression.

Authors:  R E Lawrence; K A Rasinski; J D Yoon; K G Meador; H G Koenig; F A Curlin
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.392

Review 7.  The efficacy and tolerability of bupropion in the treatment of major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Ricardo Moreira
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.859

8.  Long-term antidepressant use: a qualitative study on perspectives of patients and GPs in primary care.

Authors:  Renske C Bosman; Klaas M Huijbregts; Peter Fm Verhaak; Henricus G Ruhé; Harm Wj van Marwijk; Anton Jlm van Balkom; Neeltje M Batelaan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  What Are the Implications of the STAR*D Trial for Primary Care? A Review and Synthesis.

Authors:  Nhu N Huynh; Roger S McIntyre
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2008

Review 10.  [Antidepressive pharmacotherapy. In slight and severe disease, young and old].

Authors:  T C Baghai; H P Volz; H J Möller
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 0.743

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.