Literature DB >> 17454973

Widespread genealogical nonmonophyly in species of Pinus subgenus Strobus.

John Syring1, Kathleen Farrell, Roman Businský, Richard Cronn, Aaron Liston.   

Abstract

Phylogenetic relationships among Pinus species from subgenus Strobus remain unresolved despite combined efforts based on nrITS and cpDNA. To provide greater resolution among these taxa, a 900-bp intron from a late embryogenesis abundant (LEA)-like gene (IFG8612)was sequenced from 39 pine species, with two or more alleles representing 33 species. Nineteen of 33 species exhibited allelic nonmonphyly in the strict consensus tree, and 10 deviated significantly from allelic monophyly based on topology incongruence tests. Intraspecific nucleotide diversity ranged from 0.0 to 0.0211, and analysis of variance shows that nucleotide diversity was strongly associated (P < 0.0001)with the degree of species monophyly. Although species nonmonophyly complicates phylogenetic interpretations, this nuclear locus offers greater topological support than previously observed for cpDNA or nrITS. Lacking evidence for hybridization, recombination, or imperfect taxonomy, we feel that incomplete lineage sorting remains the best explanation for the polymorphisms shared among species. Depending on the species, coalescent expectations indicate that reciprocal monophyly will be more likely than paraphyly in 1.71 to 24.0 x 10(6) years, and that complete genome-wide coalescence in these species may require up to 76.3 x 10(6) years. The absence of allelic coalescence is a severe constraint in the application of phylogenetic methods in Pinus, and taxa sharing similar life history traits with Pinus are likely to show species nonmonophyly using nuclear markers.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17454973     DOI: 10.1080/10635150701258787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  29 in total

1.  New insights into Trimezieae (Iridaceae) phylogeny: what do molecular data tell us?

Authors:  Juliana Lovo; Richard C Winkworth; Renato Mello-Silva
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Incongruence among mitochondrial, chloroplast and nuclear gene trees in Pinus subgenus Strobus (Pinaceae).

Authors:  Kiyomi Tsutsui; Atsushi Suwa; Kei'ichi Sawada; Toshihide Kato; Takeshi A Ohsawa; Yasuyuki Watano
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 2.629

3.  Multiple markers and multiple individuals refine true seal phylogeny and bring molecules and morphology back in line.

Authors:  Tara Lynn Fulton; Curtis Strobeck
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The evolutionary genetics of the genes underlying phenotypic associations for loblolly pine (Pinus taeda, Pinaceae).

Authors:  Andrew J Eckert; Jill L Wegrzyn; John D Liechty; Jennifer M Lee; W Patrick Cumbie; John M Davis; Barry Goldfarb; Carol A Loopstra; Sreenath R Palle; Tania Quesada; Charles H Langley; David B Neale
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Population-level genetic variation and climate change in a biodiversity hotspot.

Authors:  Kristina A Schierenbeck
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Patterns of population structure and environmental associations to aridity across the range of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L., Pinaceae).

Authors:  Andrew J Eckert; Joost van Heerwaarden; Jill L Wegrzyn; C Dana Nelson; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra; Santíago C González-Martínez; David B Neale
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The probability of monophyly of a sample of gene lineages on a species tree.

Authors:  Rohan S Mehta; David Bryant; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Integrated Bayesian species delimitation and morphological diagnostics of chorioptic mange mites (Acariformes: Psoroptidae: Chorioptes).

Authors:  Andre V Bochkov; Pavel B Klimov; Gete Hestvik; Alexander P Saveljev
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 2.289

9.  Increasing phylogenetic resolution at low taxonomic levels using massively parallel sequencing of chloroplast genomes.

Authors:  Matthew Parks; Richard Cronn; Aaron Liston
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 7.431

10.  Universal artifacts affect the branching of phylogenetic trees, not universal scaling laws.

Authors:  Cristian R Altaba
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.