AIMS: The transgenic enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) expressing 'green' mouse (C57BL/6-TgN(ACTbEGFP)1Osb) is a widely used tool in stem cell research, where the ubiquitous nature of EGFP expression is critical to track the fate of single or small groups of transplanted haematopoietic stem cells (HSC). Our aim was to investigate this assumed ubiquitous expression by performing a detailed histological survey of EGFP expression in these mice. METHODS: Fluorescent microscopy of frozen tissue sections was used to perform a detailed histological survey of the pattern of EGFP expression in these mice. Flow cytometry was also used to determine the expression pattern in blood and bone marrow. RESULTS: Three patterns of EGFP expression were noted. In most tissues there was an apparently stochastic variegation of the transgene, with individual cell types demonstrating highly variable rates of EGFP expression. Certain specific cell types such as pancreatic ductal epithelium, cerebral cortical neurones and glial cells and glomerular mesangial cells consistently lacked EGFP expression, while others, including pancreatic islet cells, expressed EGFP only at extremely low levels, barely distinguishable from background. Lastly, in the colon and stomach the pattern of EGFP expression was suggestive of clonal inactivation. Only cardiac and skeletal muscle showed near ubiquitous expression. CONCLUSIONS: These findings raise questions regarding the 'ubiquitous' expression of EGFP in these transgenic mice and suggest caution in relying overly on EGFP alone as an infallible marker of donor cell origin.
AIMS: The transgenic enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) expressing 'green' mouse (C57BL/6-TgN(ACTbEGFP)1Osb) is a widely used tool in stem cell research, where the ubiquitous nature of EGFP expression is critical to track the fate of single or small groups of transplanted haematopoietic stem cells (HSC). Our aim was to investigate this assumed ubiquitous expression by performing a detailed histological survey of EGFP expression in these mice. METHODS: Fluorescent microscopy of frozen tissue sections was used to perform a detailed histological survey of the pattern of EGFP expression in these mice. Flow cytometry was also used to determine the expression pattern in blood and bone marrow. RESULTS: Three patterns of EGFP expression were noted. In most tissues there was an apparently stochastic variegation of the transgene, with individual cell types demonstrating highly variable rates of EGFP expression. Certain specific cell types such as pancreatic ductal epithelium, cerebral cortical neurones and glial cells and glomerular mesangial cells consistently lacked EGFP expression, while others, including pancreatic islet cells, expressed EGFP only at extremely low levels, barely distinguishable from background. Lastly, in the colon and stomach the pattern of EGFP expression was suggestive of clonal inactivation. Only cardiac and skeletal muscle showed near ubiquitous expression. CONCLUSIONS: These findings raise questions regarding the 'ubiquitous' expression of EGFP in these transgenic mice and suggest caution in relying overly on EGFP alone as an infallible marker of donor cell origin.
Authors: Michael W Epperly; Rebecca Rugo; Shaonan Cao; Hong Wang; Darcy Franicola; Julie P Goff; Hongmei Shen; Xichen Zhang; Dominika Wiktor-Brown; Bevin P Engelward; Joel S Greenberger Journal: In Vivo Date: 2009 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: C T Rubin; E Capilla; Y K Luu; B Busa; H Crawford; D J Nolan; V Mittal; C J Rosen; J E Pessin; S Judex Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-10-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Daniel J Angelini; Qingning Su; Irina A Kolosova; Chunling Fan; John T Skinner; Kazuyo Yamaji-Kegan; Michael Collector; Saul J Sharkis; Roger A Johns Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-06-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Irka M Redelsperger; Tony Taldone; Elyn R Riedel; Michelle L Lepherd; Neil S Lipman; Felix R Wolf Journal: J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci Date: 2016 Impact factor: 1.232
Authors: Christopher J Scarlett; Emily K Colvin; Mark Pinese; David K Chang; Adrienne L Morey; Elizabeth A Musgrove; Marina Pajic; Minoti Apte; Susan M Henshall; Robert L Sutherland; James G Kench; Andrew V Biankin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-10-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Eric J Horstick; Diana C Jordan; Sadie A Bergeron; Kathryn M Tabor; Mihaela Serpe; Benjamin Feldman; Harold A Burgess Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2015-01-27 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Kenichi Kimura; Astrid Ooms; Kathrin Graf-Riesen; Maithreyan Kuppusamy; Andreas Unger; Julia Schuld; Jan Daerr; Achim Lother; Caroline Geisen; Lutz Hein; Satoru Takahashi; Guang Li; Wilhelm Röll; Wilhelm Bloch; Peter F M van der Ven; Wolfgang A Linke; Sean M Wu; Pitter F Huesgen; Jörg Höhfeld; Dieter O Fürst; Bernd K Fleischmann; Michael Hesse Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: James D Kretlow; Yu-Qing Jin; Wei Liu; Wen Jie Zhang; Tan-Hui Hong; Guangdong Zhou; L Scott Baggett; Antonios G Mikos; Yilin Cao Journal: BMC Cell Biol Date: 2008-10-28 Impact factor: 4.241