Literature DB >> 17454545

Different centre of pressure patterns within the golf stroke II: group-based analysis.

K A Ball1, R J Best.   

Abstract

Although the golf coaching literature stresses the importance of weight transfer during the swing, research has been conflicting or lacking statistical support. A potential problem with previous studies is that no attempt was made to account for different movement strategies in the golf swing. This study evaluated the relationship between centre of pressure measures and club head velocity within two previously identified swing styles, the "Front Foot" and "Reverse" styles. Thirty-nine Front Foot golfers and 19 Reverse golfers performed swings with a driver while standing on two force plates. From the force plate data, centre of pressure displacement, velocity, range, and timing parameters were calculated. Correlation and regression analysis indicated that a larger range of centre of pressure and a more rapid centre of pressure movement in the downswing was associated with a larger club head velocity at ball contact for the Front Foot group. For the Reverse golfers, positioning the centre of pressure further from the back foot at late backswing and a more rapid centre of pressure transfer towards the back foot at ball contact was associated with a larger club head velocity at ball contact. This study has highlighted the importance of identifying different movement strategies before evaluating performance measures, as different parameters were found to be important for the Front Foot and Reverse styles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17454545     DOI: 10.1080/02640410600875002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  10 in total

Review 1.  The role of physiology in the development of golf performance.

Authors:  Mark F Smith
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Golfing skill level postural control differences: a brief report.

Authors:  James S Wrobel; Samuel Marclay; Bijan Najafi
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Biomechanical Effects of Ball Position on Address Position Variables of Elite Golfers.

Authors:  Sung Eun Kim; Young-Chul Koh; Joon-Haeng Cho; Sae Yong Lee; Hae-Dong Lee; Sung-Cheol Lee
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Comparing the Kinematic Characteristics of the Lower Limbs in Table Tennis: Differences between Diagonal and Straight Shots Using the Forehand Loop.

Authors:  Yuqi He; Xiang Lv; Zhexiao Zhou; Dong Sun; Julien S Baker; Yaodong Gu
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  MODIFYING STANCE ALTERS THE PEAK KNEE ADDUCTION MOMENT DURING A GOLF SWING.

Authors:  Quenten L Hooker; Robert Shapiro; Terry Malone; Michael B Pohl
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-08

Review 6.  Competitive elite golf: a review of the relationships between playing results, technique and physique.

Authors:  John Hellström
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.928

7.  Golf Swing Rotational Velocity: The Essential Follow-Through.

Authors:  Katherine M Steele; Eugene Y Roh; Gordhan Mahtani; David W Meister; Amy L Ladd; Jessica Rose
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2018-10-31

8.  Small changes in ball position at address cause a chain effect in golf swing.

Authors:  Sung Eun Kim; Jangyun Lee; Sae Yong Lee; Hae-Dong Lee; Jae Kun Shim; Sung-Cheol Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The kinematic analysis of the lower limb during topspin forehand loop between different level table tennis athletes.

Authors:  Yuqi He; Xiang Lyu; Dong Sun; Julien S Baker; Yaodong Gu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Lower limb kinetic comparisons between the chasse step and one step footwork during stroke play in table tennis.

Authors:  Yuqi He; Dong Sun; Xiaoyi Yang; Gusztáv Fekete; Julien S Baker; Yaodong Gu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 2.984

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.