Literature DB >> 17454542

An examination of the planar nature of golf club motion in the swings of experienced players.

S Coleman1, D Anderson.   

Abstract

The golf swing has been modelled as a planar movement, but recent findings suggest that the upper limbs and golf club do not move in a single plane. However, the idea that the club alone can be swung in a single inclined plane has not been investigated mathematically. The aims of this study were to determine whether a single plane could be fitted to club motion, and if this plane varied for different clubs. Ten golfers (handicap 1-5) performed repeated, consistent swings with three clubs (driver, 5-iron, and pitching wedge). The motion of each club during the downswing was fitted to a single plane. The fit of the plane varied between golfers and clubs (r(2) = 0.871-0.995, root mean square residual = 44.9-166.2 mm). Mean angles of the plane to the reference horizontal Z axis (driver: 125.5 degrees , s = 3.0; 5-iron: 117.1 degrees , s = 3.0; wedge: 113.6 degrees , s = 2.7) and target line axis (driver: -7.8 degrees , s = 5.9; 5-iron: -4.9 degrees , s = 5.7; wedge: -5.9 degrees , s = 6.0) were significantly (P < 0.05) different. Further analysis revealed a single plane was more appropriate for some participants than others, but that it might be neither desirable nor possible in some cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17454542     DOI: 10.1080/02640410601113239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  6 in total

1.  Kinematic analyses of the golf swing hub path and its role in golfer/club kinetic transfers.

Authors:  Steven M Nesbit; Ryan McGinnis
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Golfing skill level postural control differences: a brief report.

Authors:  James S Wrobel; Samuel Marclay; Bijan Najafi
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Kinetic constrained optimization of the golf swing hub path.

Authors:  Steven M Nesbit; Ryan S McGinnis
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 4.  Golf Swing Biomechanics: A Systematic Review and Methodological Recommendations for Kinematics.

Authors:  Maxime Bourgain; Philippe Rouch; Olivier Rouillon; Patricia Thoreux; Christophe Sauret
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-09

5.  A comparison of golf shoe designs highlights greater ground reaction forces with shorter irons.

Authors:  Paul Worsfold; Neal A Smith; Rosemary J Dyson
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 6.  The Biomechanics of the Modern Golf Swing: Implications for Lower Back Injuries.

Authors:  Michael H Cole; Paul N Grimshaw
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 11.136

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.