Literature DB >> 17453515

Magnetic resonance imaging in suspected rectal cancer: determining tumor localization, stage, and sphincter-saving resectability at 3-Tesla-sustained high resolution.

L Winter1, H Bruhn, J Langrehr, P Neuhaus, R Felix, Lopez E Hänninen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess image quality and overall accuracy of 3-Tesla (3T)-sustained high-resolution magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for diagnostic preoperative workup in suspected rectal carcinoma.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients with suspected rectal cancer underwent unenhanced and contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed pelvic high-resolution MR imaging using a four-channel phased-array pelvic coil at 3T. Image quality, tumor stage, distance from the anorectal margin, and sphincter-saving resectability were prospectively assessed by two blinded readers. The results were correlated with clinical, surgical, and histopathologic findings.
RESULTS: In all 23 patients, MR images were of diagnostic quality, and malignancy was correctly identified in 21 patients. The accuracy for determining sphincter-saving resectability was 100% (19/19). T stage and N stage were correctly diagnosed in 95% and 91%, respectively. MRI allowed correct identification of tumor extension and its relation to surgically relevant pelvic structures including the anorectal margin and mesorectal fascia. Transverse T2-weighted fast spin-echo images compared superiorly to all other sequences for the diagnosis of mesorectal infiltration and lymph node involvement. Moreover, transverse fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images were valuable for identifying tumor infiltration, while sagittal sections were useful for the detection of longitudinal tumor extension.
CONCLUSION: MR imaging with phased-array receiver coils at 3T facilitated both visualization of different pathologic conditions of the rectum and accurate determination of tumor stage in rectal carcinomas. Thus, this noninvasive diagnostic approach appeared highly suitable for the assessment of patients with suspected rectal carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17453515     DOI: 10.1080/02841850701196914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  14 in total

1.  Consensus statement: the 16th Annual Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference; Saskatoon, Saskatchewan; September 5-6, 2014.

Authors:  S Ahmed; O Bathe; S Berry; D Buie; J Davies; C Doll; S Dowden; S Gill; V Gordon; P Hebbard; E Jones; H Kennecke; S Koski; M Krahn; D Le; H Lim; C Lund; Y Luo; A Mcffadden; J Mcghie; K Mulder; J Park; F Rashidi; A Sami; K T Tan; R Wong
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  Multimodal imaging evaluation in staging of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Suk Hee Heo; Jin Woong Kim; Sang Soo Shin; Yong Yeon Jeong; Heoung-Keun Kang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Imaging Procedures for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Bettina Baeßler; David Maintz; Thorsten Persigehl
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2016-06-08

4.  Value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of viable tumour after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: comparison with T2 weighted and PET/CT imaging.

Authors:  I Song; S H Kim; S J Lee; J Y Choi; M J Kim; H Rhim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  3-T MRI with phased-array surface coil in the local staging of rectal cancer.

Authors:  F Sani; M Foresti; A Parmiggiani; V D'Andrea; A Manenti; C Amorotti; R Scotti; E Gallo; P Torricelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  MRI can be used to assess advanced T-stage colon carcinoma as well as rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Akitoshi Inoue; Shinichi Ohta; Norihisa Nitta; Masahiro Yoshimura; Tomoharu Shimizu; Masaji Tani; Ryoji Kushima; Kiyoshi Murata
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 7.  MRI in local staging of rectal cancer: an update.

Authors:  Umit Tapan; Mustafa Ozbayrak; Servet Tatlı
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.630

8.  The anthropometric definition of the rectum is highly variable.

Authors:  Molly A Wasserman; Michael F McGee; Irene B Helenowski; Amy L Halverson; Anne-Marie Boller; Steven J Stryker
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in rectal cancer: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Michael R Torkzad; Lars Påhlman; Bengt Glimelius
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2010-08-15

10.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of the Accuracy of Various Lymph Node Staging Criteria in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zixuan Zhuang; Yang Zhang; Mingtian Wei; Xuyang Yang; Ziqiang Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.