BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has a highly polymorphic CA repeat region that affects transcription efficiency and anti-EGFR drug sensitivity in carcinomas. Erlotinib is an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for pancreatic cancer treatment. We analyzed the impact of EGFR intron 1 CA repeat lengths in pancreatic cancer clinical outcome and in vitro response to erlotinib. METHODS: Allele-specific EGFR intron 1 lengths were analyzed in 30 microdissected pancreatic cancer surgical specimens, matched peripheral blood samples, and 9 pancreatic cancer cell lines treated with erlotinib. CA repeat lengths were correlated with survival, tumor parameters, molecular markers of EGFR pathway activation, and in vitro antiproliferative effects of erlotinib. RESULTS: Both patient samples and cell lines displayed the full spectrum of EGFR CA repeat lengths (14-22 per allele). Patients with shorter sum of total CA repeats (<36) had worse median survival than patients with >or=36 repeats (13.7 vs 30.6 months, P = .002). Shorter patient EGFR intron 1 length correlated with EGFR expression (P = .026). Tumor intron 1 length was identical to that of matched peripheral blood specimens. There was no correlation between EGFR intron 1 length and pancreatic cancer stage, nodal status, grade, or expression of p-EGFR, p-ERK and p-Akt. Shorter EGFR intron 1 length was associated with in vitro response to erlotinib treatment (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Shorter EGFR intron 1 CA repeat length is associated with worse pancreatic cancer clinical prognosis and in vitro response to erlotinib. EGFR intron 1 length can be reliably measured in peripheral blood and may translate into a quantitative predictive marker of both pancreatic cancer aggressiveness and erlotinib sensitivity.
BACKGROUND:Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has a highly polymorphic CA repeat region that affects transcription efficiency and anti-EGFR drug sensitivity in carcinomas. Erlotinib is an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for pancreatic cancer treatment. We analyzed the impact of EGFR intron 1 CA repeat lengths in pancreatic cancer clinical outcome and in vitro response to erlotinib. METHODS: Allele-specific EGFR intron 1 lengths were analyzed in 30 microdissected pancreatic cancer surgical specimens, matched peripheral blood samples, and 9 pancreatic cancer cell lines treated with erlotinib. CA repeat lengths were correlated with survival, tumor parameters, molecular markers of EGFR pathway activation, and in vitro antiproliferative effects of erlotinib. RESULTS: Both patient samples and cell lines displayed the full spectrum of EGFR CA repeat lengths (14-22 per allele). Patients with shorter sum of total CA repeats (<36) had worse median survival than patients with >or=36 repeats (13.7 vs 30.6 months, P = .002). Shorter patientEGFR intron 1 length correlated with EGFR expression (P = .026). Tumor intron 1 length was identical to that of matched peripheral blood specimens. There was no correlation between EGFR intron 1 length and pancreatic cancer stage, nodal status, grade, or expression of p-EGFR, p-ERK and p-Akt. Shorter EGFR intron 1 length was associated with in vitro response to erlotinib treatment (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Shorter EGFR intron 1 CA repeat length is associated with worse pancreatic cancer clinical prognosis and in vitro response to erlotinib. EGFR intron 1 length can be reliably measured in peripheral blood and may translate into a quantitative predictive marker of both pancreatic cancer aggressiveness and erlotinib sensitivity.
Authors: J Spencer Liles; Juan Pablo Arnoletti; Ching-Wei D Tzeng; J Harrison Howard; Andrew V Kossenkov; Peter Kulesza; Martin J Heslin; Andrey Frolov Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2010-09-30 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Stefan Boeck; Andreas Jung; Rüdiger P Laubender; Jens Neumann; Rosalind Egg; Clara Goritschan; Steffen Ormanns; Michael Haas; Dominik P Modest; Thomas Kirchner; Volker Heinemann Journal: J Gastroenterol Date: 2013-02-23 Impact factor: 7.527
Authors: Andrey Frolov; J Spencer Liles; Andrew V Kossenkov; Ching-Wei D Tzeng; Nirag Jhala; Peter Kulesza; Shyam Varadarajulu; Mohamad Eloubeidi; Martin J Heslin; J Pablo Arnoletti Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2010-04-21 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Georgios Voidonikolas; Stephanie S Kreml; Changyi Chen; William E Fisher; F Charles Brunicardi; Richard A Gibbs; Marie-Claude Gingras Journal: World J Surg Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: S Boeck; A Jung; R P Laubender; J Neumann; R Egg; C Goritschan; U Vehling-Kaiser; C Winkelmann; L Fischer von Weikersthal; M R Clemens; T C Gauler; A Märten; S Klein; G Kojouharoff; M Barner; M Geissler; T F Greten; U Mansmann; T Kirchner; V Heinemann Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2012-11-20 Impact factor: 7.640