BACKGROUND: Exercise intolerance is common in hemodialysis (HD) and renal transplant (RTx) patients and is related to muscle weakness. Its pathogenesis may vary between these groups leading to a different response to exercise. The aim of the study was to compare intrinsic muscular parameters between HD and RTx patients and controls, and to assess the response to exercise training on exercise capacity and muscular structure and function in these groups. METHODS: Quadriceps function (isokinetic dynamometry), body composition (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry), and vastus lateralis muscle biopsies were analyzed before and after a 12-week lasting training-program in 35 RTx patients, 16 HD patients, and 21 healthy controls. RESULTS: At baseline, myosin heavy chain (MyHC) isoform composition and enzyme activities were not different between the groups. VO2peak and muscle strength improved significantly and comparably over the training-period in RTx, HD patients and controls (p(time)<0.05). The proportion of MyHC type I isoforms decreased (p(time)<0.001) and type IIa MyHC isoforms increased (p(time)<0.05). The 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA-dehydrogenase activity increased (p(time)=0.052). Intrinsic muscular changes were not significantly different between groups. In the HD group, changes in lean body mass were significantly related to changes in muscle insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-II and IGF binding protein-3. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormalities in metabolic enzyme activities or muscle fiber redistribution do not appear to be involved in muscle dysfunction in RTx and HD patients. Exercise training has comparable beneficial effects on functional and intrinsic muscular parameters in RTx patients, HD patients, and controls. In HD patients, the anabolic response to exercise training is related to changes in the muscle IGF system.
BACKGROUND: Exercise intolerance is common in hemodialysis (HD) and renal transplant (RTx) patients and is related to muscle weakness. Its pathogenesis may vary between these groups leading to a different response to exercise. The aim of the study was to compare intrinsic muscular parameters between HD and RTx patients and controls, and to assess the response to exercise training on exercise capacity and muscular structure and function in these groups. METHODS: Quadriceps function (isokinetic dynamometry), body composition (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry), and vastus lateralis muscle biopsies were analyzed before and after a 12-week lasting training-program in 35 RTx patients, 16 HDpatients, and 21 healthy controls. RESULTS: At baseline, myosin heavy chain (MyHC) isoform composition and enzyme activities were not different between the groups. VO2peak and muscle strength improved significantly and comparably over the training-period in RTx, HDpatients and controls (p(time)<0.05). The proportion of MyHC type I isoforms decreased (p(time)<0.001) and type IIa MyHC isoforms increased (p(time)<0.05). The 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA-dehydrogenase activity increased (p(time)=0.052). Intrinsic muscular changes were not significantly different between groups. In the HD group, changes in lean body mass were significantly related to changes in muscle insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-II and IGF binding protein-3. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormalities in metabolic enzyme activities or muscle fiber redistribution do not appear to be involved in muscle dysfunction in RTx and HDpatients. Exercise training has comparable beneficial effects on functional and intrinsic muscular parameters in RTx patients, HDpatients, and controls. In HDpatients, the anabolic response to exercise training is related to changes in the muscle IGF system.
Authors: Dorien M Zelle; Gerald Klaassen; Edwin van Adrichem; Stephan J L Bakker; Eva Corpeleijn; Gerjan Navis Journal: Nat Rev Nephrol Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 28.314
Authors: Jeroen P Kooman; Peter Kotanko; Annemie M W J Schols; Paul G Shiels; Peter Stenvinkel Journal: Nat Rev Nephrol Date: 2014-10-07 Impact factor: 28.314
Authors: Natascha J H Broers; Remy J H Martens; Tom Cornelis; Frank M van der Sande; Nanda M P Diederen; Marc M H Hermans; Joris J J M Wirtz; Frank Stifft; Constantijn J A M Konings; Tom Dejagere; Bernard Canaud; Peter Wabel; Karel M L Leunissen; Jeroen P Kooman Journal: Nephron Date: 2017-06-08 Impact factor: 2.847
Authors: Dorien M Zelle; Eva Corpeleijn; Ronald P Stolk; Mathieu H G de Greef; Rijk O B Gans; Jaap J Homan van der Heide; Gerjan Navis; Stephan J L Bakker Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2011-03-03 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Elisa J Gordon; Thomas R Prohaska; Mary P Gallant; Ashwini R Sehgal; David Strogatz; Recai Yucel; David Conti; Laura A Siminoff Journal: Transpl Int Date: 2009-07-10 Impact factor: 3.782
Authors: Flávio Gobbis Shiraishi; Fernanda Stringuetta Belik; Viviana Rugolo Oliveira E Silva; Luis Cuadrado Martin; João Carlos Hueb; Renato de Souza Gonçalves; Jacqueline Costa Teixeira Caramori; Pasqual Barreti; Roberto Jorge da Silva Franco Journal: Exp Diabetes Res Date: 2012-04-09