Literature DB >> 17452425

MELD score and serum sodium in the prediction of survival of patients with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation.

Maria-Carlota Londoño1, Andrés Cárdenas, Mónica Guevara, Llorenç Quintó, Dara de Las Heras, Miguel Navasa, Antoni Rimola, Juan-Carlos Garcia-Valdecasas, Vicente Arroyo, Pere Ginès.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Serum sodium predicts prognosis in cirrhosis and may improve the prognostic accuracy of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, but the available information is limited. The aim of the present study was to assess the prognostic value of serum sodium in the prediction of survival at 3 and 12 months after listing in patients with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation, and to compare its predictive value with that of the MELD score. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 308 consecutive patients with cirrhosis listed for transplantation during a 5-year period were included in the study. The end-point was survival at 3 and 12 months before transplantation. Variables obtained at the time of listing were analysed for prognostic value using multivariable analysis. Accuracy of prognostic variables was analysed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
RESULTS: The MELD score and serum sodium concentration were the only independent predictors of survival at 3 and 12 months after listing. Low serum sodium was associated with an increased risk of death in all subpopulations of patients with cirrhosis categorised according to the major complication developed before listing. The area under the ROC curves for serum sodium and MELD score was not significantly different both at 3 months (0.83 vs 0.79, respectively) and at 12 months (0.70 vs 0.77, respectively). The addition of serum sodium did not significantly improve the accuracy of the MELD score in the prediction of survival at 3 and 12 months.
CONCLUSION: In patients with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation, serum sodium and MELD were found to be independent predictors of survival. Larger studies are needed to determine whether the addition of serum sodium to MELD can improve its prognostic accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17452425      PMCID: PMC1954951          DOI: 10.1136/gut.2006.102764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  39 in total

Review 1.  Hepatic encephalopathy in chronic liver disease: a clinical manifestation of astrocyte swelling and low-grade cerebral edema?

Authors:  D Häussinger; G Kircheis; R Fischer; F Schliess; S vom Dahl
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 25.083

2.  MELD and PELD: application of survival models to liver allocation.

Authors:  R H Wiesner; S V McDiarmid; P S Kamath; E B Edwards; M Malinchoc; W K Kremers; R A Krom; W R Kim
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 3.  Breaking down barriers: helpful breakthrough statistical methods you need to understand better.

Authors:  E H Blackstone
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Evidence-based incorporation of serum sodium concentration into MELD.

Authors:  Scott W Biggins; W Ray Kim; Norah A Terrault; Sammy Saab; Vijay Balan; Thomas Schiano; Joanne Benson; Terry Therneau; Walter Kremers; Russell Wiesner; Patrick Kamath; Goran Klintmalm
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Addition of serum sodium into the MELD score predicts waiting list mortality better than MELD alone.

Authors:  Andres E Ruf; Walter K Kremers; Lila L Chavez; Valeria I Descalzi; Luis G Podesta; Federico G Villamil
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.799

6.  A prognostic model for predicting survival in cirrhosis with ascites.

Authors:  G Fernández-Esparrach; A Sánchez-Fueyo; P Ginès; J Uriz; L Quintó; P J Ventura; A Cárdenas; M Guevara; P Sort; W Jiménez; R Bataller; V Arroyo; J Rodés
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 25.083

7.  Deaths on the liver transplant waiting list: an analysis of competing risks.

Authors:  W Ray Kim; Terry M Therneau; Joanne T Benson; Walter K Kremers; Charles B Rosen; Gregory J Gores; E Rolland Dickson
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 8.  A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease.

Authors:  P S Kamath; R H Wiesner; M Malinchoc; W Kremers; T M Therneau; C L Kosberg; G D'Amico; E R Dickson; W R Kim
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 9.  Impact of pretransplant renal failure: when is listing for kidney-liver indicated?

Authors:  Connie L Davis
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.799

10.  Hyponatremia impairs early posttransplantation outcome in patients with cirrhosis undergoing liver transplantation.

Authors:  Maria-Carlota Londoño; Mónica Guevara; Antoni Rimola; Miquel Navasa; Pilar Taurà; Antoni Mas; Juan-Carlos García-Valdecasas; Vicente Arroyo; Pere Ginès
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  53 in total

Review 1.  Hepatorenal Syndrome: A Review of Pathophysiology and Current Treatment Options.

Authors:  Brian Erly; William D Carey; Baljendra Kapoor; J Mark McKinney; Mathew Tam; Weiping Wang
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 2.  Prioritization for liver transplantation.

Authors:  Evangelos Cholongitas; Giacomo Germani; Andrew K Burroughs
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 46.802

3.  Pre-treatment serum bicarbonate predicts for primary tumor control after stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with localized non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Nikhil Sebastian; Trudy Wu; Erin Driscoll; Henning Willers; Suzanne Kelly; Hima Bindu Musunuru; Xiaokui Mo; Yubo Tan; Jose Bazan; Karl Haglund; Meng Xu-Welliver; Andrew M Baschnagel; Andrew Ju; Florence Keane; Terence M Williams
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Toward an accelerated adoption of data-driven findings in medicine : Research, skepticism, and the need to speed up public visibility of data-driven findings.

Authors:  Uri Kartoun
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2019-03

Review 5.  Electrolyte and Acid-Base Disturbances in End-Stage Liver Disease: A Physiopathological Approach.

Authors:  José Víctor Jiménez; Diego Luis Carrillo-Pérez; Rodrigo Rosado-Canto; Ignacio García-Juárez; Aldo Torre; David Kershenobich; Eduardo Carrillo-Maravilla
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Cystatin C: a predictor of hepatorenal syndrome in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Authors:  Mohammed A Sharawey; Eglal M Shawky; Lamia H Ali; Ahmed Ali Mohammed; Hatem A Hassan; Yasser M Fouad
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 6.047

Review 7.  Model for End-stage Liver Disease.

Authors:  Ashwani K Singal; Patrick S Kamath
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2012-12-01

8.  Value of MELD and MELD-based indices in surgical risk evaluation of cirrhotic patients: retrospective analysis of 190 cases.

Authors:  Beatriz P Costa; F Castro Sousa; Marco Serôdio; César Carvalho
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Management of Alcohol Use Disorder in Patients Requiring Liver Transplant.

Authors:  Mary R Lee; Lorenzo Leggio
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 18.112

10.  Mortality after hospitalization with mild, moderate, and severe hyponatremia.

Authors:  Sushrut S Waikar; David B Mount; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.965

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.