Literature DB >> 17449877

Echocardiographic measures of acute haemodynamic response after cardiac resynchronization therapy predict long-term clinical outcome.

Francois B Tournoux1, Chrisfouad Alabiad, Dali Fan, Annabel A Chen, Miguel Chaput, Edwin Kevin Heist, Theofanie Mela, Moussa Mansour, Vivek Reddy, Jeremy N Ruskin, Michael H Picard, Jagmeet P Singh.   

Abstract

AIMS: Although acute haemodynamic improvement in response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is reflective of a favourable cardiac contractile response, there is limited information regarding not only its ability to predict long-term clinical outcome but also cardiac-substrate-specific differences in the prognostic value of this measure. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Fifty-three heart failure patients (69 +/- 11 years) with low left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) (22 +/- 6%), wide QRS (169 +/- 31 ms), and indications for CRT were included. There were no significant differences in age, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, medications, QRS width, or LVEF between ischaemic (n = 37) and non-ischaemic (n = 16) groups. Echocardiograms were performed within 24 h of implantation with device OFF and ON. Acute haemodynamic response was measured as LV dP/dt derived from the CW Doppler of mitral regurgitation. Percentage change in dP/dt was used to classify patients: high- (HR: DeltadP/dt > 25%) or poor-responders (PR: DeltadP/dt <or= 25%). Clinical response to CRT was defined by a combined endpoint of hospitalizations and all-cause mortality at 12 months. HR group had a significantly better outcome compared to the PR group (P-value = 0.004) irrespective of the aetiology of the cardiomyopathy.
CONCLUSION: Echocardiographic assessment of the acute haemodynamic response to CRT predicts long-term clinical outcome in both ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17449877     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  11 in total

Review 1.  How to improve outcomes with cardiac resynchronisation therapy: importance of lead positioning.

Authors:  Peter J Cowburn; Christophe Leclercq
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Maximum derivative of left ventricular pressure predicts cardiac mortality after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Hirohiko Suzuki; Masayuki Shimano; Yukihiko Yoshida; Yasuya Inden; Takashi Muramatsu; Yukiomi Tsuji; Naoya Tsuboi; Haruo Hirayama; Rei Shibata; Toyoaki Murohara
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 3.  Clinical, laboratory, and pacing predictors of CRT response.

Authors:  Jagdesh Kandala; Robert K Altman; Mi Young Park; Jagmeet P Singh
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Rationale and design of a randomized trial to assess the safety and efficacy of MultiPoint Pacing (MPP) in cardiac resynchronization therapy: The MPP Trial.

Authors:  Gery Tomassoni; James Baker; Raffaele Corbisiero; Charles Love; David Martin; Robert Sheppard; Seth J Worley; Kwangdeok Lee; Imran Niazi
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 1.468

5.  SmartDelay determined AV optimization: a comparison of AV delay methods used in cardiac resynchronization therapy (SMART-AV): rationale and design.

Authors:  Kenneth M Stein; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Michael R Gold; Bernd Lemke; Ignacio Fernández Lozano; Suneet Mittal; Francis G Spinale; Jennifer E Van Eyk; Alan D Waggoner; Timothy E Meyer
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-10-10       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 6.  Echocardiographic assessment of ventricular dyssynchrony.

Authors:  John Gorcsan
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2008-03

7.  Right ventricular lead adjustment in cardiac resynchronization therapy and acute hemodynamic response: a pilot study.

Authors:  Prabhat Kumar; Gaurav A Upadhyay; Christine Cavaliere-Ogus; E Kevin Heist; Robert K Altman; Neal A Chatterjee; Kimberly A Parks; Jagmeet P Singh
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 8.  Atrioventricular and interventricular delay optimization in cardiac resynchronization therapy: physiological principles and overview of available methods.

Authors:  Patrick Houthuizen; Frank A L E Bracke; Berry M van Gelder
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.214

9.  Impact of contractile reserve on acute response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Marie Moonen; Mario Senechal; Bernard Cosyns; Pierre Melon; Eric Nellessen; Luc Pierard; Patrizio Lancellotti
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 2.062

10.  A multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial of cardiac resynchronization therapy guided by invasive dP/dt.

Authors:  Manav Sohal; Shoaib Hamid; Giovanni Perego; Paolo Della Bella; Shaumik Adhya; John Paisey; Tim Betts; Ravi Kamdar; Pier Lambiase; Francisco Leyva; Janet M McComb; Jonathan Behar; Thomas Jackson; Simon Claridge; Vishal Mehta; Mark Elliott; Steven Niederer; Reza Razavi; C Aldo Rinaldi
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2021-01-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.