OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to perform volumetric quantitative CT (QCT) of the spine and hip using nondedicated contrast-enhanced standard MDCT data sets and to derive a conversion factor for bone mineral density (BMD) assessment based on dedicated volumetric QCT data sets. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty postmenopausal women with a mean +/- SD age of 71 +/- 9 years underwent routine contrast-enhanced abdominal and pelvic MDCT. Before this imaging examination, standard volumetric QCT of the spine (L1-L3, n = 40) and hip (n = 21) was performed. Relations between QCT and contrast-enhanced MDCT findings were assessed with linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Mean lumbar BMD was 84.1 +/- 35.8 mg/mL, and mean femoral BMD was 0.62 +/- 0.12 g/cm2, as determined with QCT. Contrast-enhancement values with MDCT were on average 30.3% higher than those of QCT in the spine and 2.3% higher in the proximal femur (p < 0.05). Based on linear regression, a correlation coefficient of r = 0.98 was calculated for lumbar BMD with the equation BMD(QCT) = 0.96xBMD(MDCT) - 20.9 mg/mL. A coefficient of r = 0.99 was calculated for the proximal femur with the equation BMD(QCT) = 0.99xBMD(MDCT) - 12 mg/cm2 (p < 0.01). In 17 of 40 patients, 33 vertebral fractures were found. The dedicated QCT and enhanced MDCT data sets did not show a significant difference (p > 0.05) between patients with fractures and those without fractures. CONCLUSION: With the conversion factors, reliable volumetric BMD measurements can be calculated for the hip and the spine from routine abdominal and pelvic MDCT data sets.
OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to perform volumetric quantitative CT (QCT) of the spine and hip using nondedicated contrast-enhanced standard MDCT data sets and to derive a conversion factor for bone mineral density (BMD) assessment based on dedicated volumetric QCT data sets. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty postmenopausal women with a mean +/- SD age of 71 +/- 9 years underwent routine contrast-enhanced abdominal and pelvic MDCT. Before this imaging examination, standard volumetric QCT of the spine (L1-L3, n = 40) and hip (n = 21) was performed. Relations between QCT and contrast-enhanced MDCT findings were assessed with linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Mean lumbar BMD was 84.1 +/- 35.8 mg/mL, and mean femoral BMD was 0.62 +/- 0.12 g/cm2, as determined with QCT. Contrast-enhancement values with MDCT were on average 30.3% higher than those of QCT in the spine and 2.3% higher in the proximal femur (p < 0.05). Based on linear regression, a correlation coefficient of r = 0.98 was calculated for lumbar BMD with the equation BMD(QCT) = 0.96xBMD(MDCT) - 20.9 mg/mL. A coefficient of r = 0.99 was calculated for the proximal femur with the equation BMD(QCT) = 0.99xBMD(MDCT) - 12 mg/cm2 (p < 0.01). In 17 of 40 patients, 33 vertebral fractures were found. The dedicated QCT and enhanced MDCT data sets did not show a significant difference (p > 0.05) between patients with fractures and those without fractures. CONCLUSION: With the conversion factors, reliable volumetric BMD measurements can be calculated for the hip and the spine from routine abdominal and pelvic MDCT data sets.
Authors: Benedikt J Schwaiger; David L Kopperdahl; Lorenzo Nardo; Luca Facchetti; Alexandra S Gersing; Jan Neumann; Kwang J Lee; Tony M Keaveny; Thomas M Link Journal: Bone Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Nicholas K Weber; Jeff L Fidler; Tony M Keaveny; Bart L Clarke; Sundeep Khosla; Joel G Fletcher; David C Lee; Darrell S Pardi; Edward V Loftus; Sunanda V Kane; John M Barlow; Naveen S Murthy; Brenda D Becker; David H Bruining Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-01-21 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Lawrence Lo; Scott Koenig; Natalie L Leong; Brian B Shiu; S Ashfaq Hasan; Mohit N Gilotra; Kenneth C Wang Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2020-10-23 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: P J Pickhardt; T Lauder; B D Pooler; A Muñoz Del Rio; H Rosas; R J Bruce; N Binkley Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2015-07-08 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Murali Ravoori; Aneta J Czaplinska; Charles Sikes; Lin Han; Evan M Johnson; Wei Qiao; Chaan Ng; Dianna D Cody; William A Murphy; Kim-Anh Do; Nora M Navone; Vikas Kundra Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-03-29 Impact factor: 3.240