Literature DB >> 17449522

Childhood obesity: should primary school children be routinely screened? A systematic review and discussion of the evidence.

Marie Westwood1, Debra Fayter, Suzanne Hartley, Amber Rithalia, Gary Butler, Paul Glasziou, Martin Bland, John Nixon, Lisa Stirk, Mary Rudolf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Population monitoring has been introduced in UK primary schools in an effort to track the growing obesity epidemic. It has been argued that parents should be informed of their child's results, but is there evidence that moving from monitoring to screening would be effective? We describe what is known about the effectiveness of monitoring and screening for overweight and obesity in primary school children and highlight areas where evidence is lacking and research should be prioritised.
DESIGN: Systematic review with discussion of evidence gaps and future research. DATA SOURCES: Published and unpublished studies (any language) from electronic databases (inception to July 2005), clinical experts, Primary Care Trusts and Strategic Health Authorities, and reference lists of retrieved studies. REVIEW
METHODS: We included any study that evaluated measures of overweight and obesity as part of a population-level assessment and excluded studies whose primary outcome measure was prevalence.
RESULTS: There were no trials assessing the effectiveness of monitoring or screening for overweight and obesity. Studies focussed on the diagnostic accuracy of measurements. Information on the attitudes of children, parents and health professionals to monitoring was extremely sparse.
CONCLUSIONS: Our review found a lack of data on the potential impact of population monitoring or screening for obesity and more research is indicated. Identification of effective weight reduction strategies for children and clarification of the role of preventative measures are priorities. It is difficult to see how screening to identify individual children can be justified without effective interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17449522      PMCID: PMC2083728          DOI: 10.1136/adc.2006.113589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  14 in total

1.  Sensitivity and specificity of body mass index and skinfold thicknesses in detecting excess adiposity in children aged 8-12 years.

Authors:  G Bedogni; L Iughetti; M Ferrari; M Malavolti; M Poli; S Bernasconi; N Battistini
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.533

2.  Monitoring childhood obesity: assessment of the weight/height index.

Authors:  K J Ellis; S A Abrams; W W Wong
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Validity of convenient indicators of obesity.

Authors:  J D Marshall; C B Hazlett; D W Spady; P R Conger; H A Quinney
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 0.553

4.  Identification of the obese child: adequacy of the body mass index for clinical practice and epidemiology.

Authors:  J J Reilly; A R Dorosty; P M Emmett
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2000-12

Review 5.  Health consequences of obesity.

Authors:  J J Reilly; E Methven; Z C McDowell; B Hacking; D Alexander; L Stewart; C J H Kelnar
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Body mass index in screening for adiposity in children and adolescents: systematic evaluation using receiver operating characteristic curves.

Authors:  R Lazarus; L Baur; K Webb; F Blyth
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Use of BMI as a measure of overweight and obesity in a field study on 5-7 year old children.

Authors:  M Mast; K Langnäse; K Labitzke; U Bruse; U Preuss; M J Müller
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.614

8.  Validity of anthropometry in classifying youths as obese.

Authors:  J H Himes; C Bouchard
Journal:  Int J Obes       Date:  1989

9.  Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Penny F Whiting; Marie E Weswood; Anne W S Rutjes; Johannes B Reitsma; Patrick N M Bossuyt; Jos Kleijnen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews.

Authors:  Penny Whiting; Anne W S Rutjes; Johannes B Reitsma; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Jos Kleijnen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2003-11-10       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  7 in total

1.  Evaluating routine pediatric growth measurement as a screening tool for overweight and obese status.

Authors:  Ilona Hale; Emma Jackson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 3.275

2. 

Authors:  Ilona Hale; Emma Jackson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Motivational interviewing for screening and feedback and encouraging lifestyle changes to reduce relative weight in 4-8 year old children: design of the MInT study.

Authors:  Rachael W Taylor; Deirdre Brown; Anna M Dawson; Jill Haszard; Adell Cox; Elaine A Rose; Barry J Taylor; Kim Meredith-Jones; Lee Treacy; Jim Ross; Sheila M William
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Obesity-related factors in Turkish school children.

Authors:  Cihad Dündar; Hatice Öz
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-01

5.  Outcomes and costs of primary care surveillance and intervention for overweight or obese children: the LEAP 2 randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Melissa Wake; Louise A Baur; Bibi Gerner; Kay Gibbons; Lisa Gold; Jane Gunn; Penny Levickis; Zoë McCallum; Geraldine Naughton; Lena Sanci; Obioha C Ukoumunne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-09-03

6.  Family and neighbourhood socioeconomic inequalities in childhood trajectories of BMI and overweight: longitudinal study of Australian children.

Authors:  Pauline W Jansen; Fiona K Mensah; Jan M Nicholson; Melissa Wake
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The benefits and harms of providing parents with weight feedback as part of the national child measurement programme: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Catherine L Falconer; Min Hae Park; Helen Croker; Áine Skow; James Black; Sonia Saxena; Anthony S Kessel; Saffron Karlsen; Stephen Morris; Russell M Viner; Sanjay Kinra
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.295

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.