Literature DB >> 17449513

UK gamete donors' reflections on the removal of anonymity: implications for recruitment.

Lucy Frith1, Eric Blyth, Abigail Farrand.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2005, UK legislation was changed requiring any donor of gametes or embryos used in the treatment of others to agree to the disclosure of their identity to any offspring reaching the age of 18. METHODS AND
RESULTS: This paper analyses responses of a survey of existing donors' views on the removal of donor anonymity that was undertaken by the Department of Health (UK) as part of its review that preceded changes to the law on donor anonymity. The survey provides an insight into what it is about the loss of anonymity that some donors find problematic, indicating that although some donors will be reluctant to donate under conditions of non-anonymity, others have concerns about the removal of anonymity that can be addressed.
CONCLUSIONS: This paper identifies factors, in particular counselling, support and better information that could maintain gamete donor recruitment in the context of the UK's policy of non-anonymous and non-remunerated donation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17449513     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dem061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  10 in total

1.  The limits of evidence: evidence based policy and the removal of gamete donor anonymity in the UK.

Authors:  Lucy Frith
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2015-03

2.  Anonymous sperm donors' attitude towards donation and the release of identifying information.

Authors:  F Mahieu; W Decleer; K Osmanagaoglu; V Provoost
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  An overview on ethical issues about sperm donation.

Authors:  Dan Gong; Yu-Lin Liu; Zhong Zheng; Yi-Fei Tian; Zheng Li
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Online sperm donation: a survey of the demographic characteristics, motivations, preferences and experiences of sperm donors on a connection website.

Authors:  T Freeman; V Jadva; E Tranfield; S Golombok
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  The right to know one's genetic origins and cross-border medically assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Vardit Ravitsky
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2017-01-16

6.  The opposite of a step parent - The genetics without any of the emotion: 'sperm donors' reflections on identity-release donation and relatedness.

Authors:  Susanna Graham
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2021-06-24

7.  Is It Possible to Expand Oocyte Donors by Decreasing Number of Oocytes for Own Use? Insights From a Large Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Zhiqin Bu; Jiaxin Zhang; Yile Zhang; Yingpu Sun
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 5.555

8.  Beyond motivation: on what it means to be a sperm donor in Denmark.

Authors:  Sebastian Mohr
Journal:  Anthropol Med       Date:  2014

9.  A comparison of the characteristics, motivations, preferences and expectations of men donating sperm online or through a sperm bank.

Authors:  S Graham; T Freeman; V Jadva
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Egg donors' motivations, experiences, and opinions: A survey of egg donors in South Africa.

Authors:  Donrich Thaldar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.