Literature DB >> 17449324

Perceived disability and lifestyle modification following hospitalization for non-ST elevation versus ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: the patients' point of view.

Rita Yuval1, David A Halon, Basil S Lewis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Medical personnel generally believe that non-ST elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are less damaging than ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), in keeping with the lower morbidity and mortality attributed to these subgroups in randomized clinical trials. We examined whether this concept translates into a difference from the patients' point of view regarding lifestyle modification and return to work following hospitalization for ACS.
METHODS: A structured anonymous self-completed questionnaire was mailed and returned by 160 consecutive patients (age 64+/-11 years; 125 (78%) men) 3-12 months after hospitalization for ACS. In 49 patients, the diagnosis was unstable angina pectoris (UAP), in 34 non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and in 73, ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The questionnaire addressed issues relating to demographic data, medical history, occupation, employment and income before the acute event, changes following hospitalization for ACS and questions relating to current perceived health status and return to work.
RESULTS: Most (98/159, 62%) patients saw themselves as "heart patients" after hospitalization for ACS. Quality of life was perceived to have decreased in 70 (44%), self-image in 85 (53%), self-confidence in 78 (49%) and sexual function in 75 (48%), with no differences according to ACS type. Anxiety was reported by 85 (54%) patients and anxiety level (1.47+/-1.25 on the Brief Symptom Inventory scale) was high. Only 38 (49%) of 77 patients who were working prior to the acute event returned to full- or part-time gainful employment. By multivariate analysis, return to work was associated with 3 variables: younger age (p=0.015), shorter duration of hospitalization (p=0.036) and higher income bracket prior to the acute event (p=0.0001), with no relation to gender, in-hospitalization revascularization strategy, rehabilitation program or to underlying cardiac diagnosis (UAP, NSTEMI or STEMI).
CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalization for ACS had a major negative impact on patient lifestyle and return to work, irrespective of the underlying cardiac diagnosis. The experience of hospitalization for an acute heart condition was uniformly traumatic with in many instances a prolonged adverse effect on patient function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17449324     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2007.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs        ISSN: 1474-5151            Impact factor:   3.908


  5 in total

1.  Scared for the scar: fearsome impact of acute cardiovascular disease on perceived kinesiophobia (fear of movement).

Authors:  Natale D Brunetti; Antonio Guerra; Riccardo Ieva; Michele Correale; Francesco Santoro; Nicola Tarantino; Matteo Di Biase
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  Return to work after an acute coronary syndrome: patients' perspective.

Authors:  Frans G Slebus; Harald T Jorstad; Ron Jg Peters; P Paul Fm Kuijer; J Han Hbm Willems; Judith K Sluiter; Monique Hw Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2012-06-08

3.  Patient-rated health status predicts prognosis following percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stenting.

Authors:  Susanne S Pedersen; Henneke Versteeg; Johan Denollet; Jin M Cheng; Patrick W Serruys; Ron T van Domburg
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Effect of Instructional Manual on Knowledge and Self-Expressed Practices among Smokers Suffering from Unstable Angina Disease.

Authors:  T Nasrabadi
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 0.611

5.  Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and the Effect on Outcome in Patients Presenting with Coronary Artery Disease and Treated with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI): Differences Noted by Sex and Age.

Authors:  Andre Conradie; John Atherton; Enayet Chowdhury; MyNgan Duong; Nisha Schwarz; Stephen Worthley; David Eccleston
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 4.964

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.