Karin E Tobin1, Kathryn E Muessig, Carl A Latkin. 1. Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. ktobin@jhsph.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the attitudes of HIV seropositive current or former drug users towards HIV partner counseling and referral services (PCRS) and to determine if opinion varies by partner type. METHODS: We used a cross-sectional survey using structured and semi-structured questions to measure attitudes towards PCRS. RESULTS: The majority of the sample was African-American (97%), male (63%) and had been diagnosed with HIV for a mean of 7.9 years. Most agreed that PCRS would help stop the spread of HIV and AIDS (87%). A range of reactions to scenarios of their drug and sex partners being informed were observed and included positive reactions (e.g. PCRS as a means to facilitate testing of their partners and early treatment) to negative (e.g. feelings about guilt, shame and concern about partner responses). CONCLUSION: Data from this study indicate that HIV positive drug users view PCRS as a viable practice for preventing the spread of HIV, though barriers exist to engaging clients to identify partners. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The range of reactions noted in this study underscore the importance of providing flexible options for PCRS based on partner type. Additional training for counselors, time for case-management and meetings with sex and drug partners and fieldwork for locating contacts are important considerations for providers.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the attitudes of HIV seropositive current or former drug users towards HIV partner counseling and referral services (PCRS) and to determine if opinion varies by partner type. METHODS: We used a cross-sectional survey using structured and semi-structured questions to measure attitudes towards PCRS. RESULTS: The majority of the sample was African-American (97%), male (63%) and had been diagnosed with HIV for a mean of 7.9 years. Most agreed that PCRS would help stop the spread of HIV and AIDS (87%). A range of reactions to scenarios of their drug and sex partners being informed were observed and included positive reactions (e.g. PCRS as a means to facilitate testing of their partners and early treatment) to negative (e.g. feelings about guilt, shame and concern about partner responses). CONCLUSION: Data from this study indicate that HIV positive drug users view PCRS as a viable practice for preventing the spread of HIV, though barriers exist to engaging clients to identify partners. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The range of reactions noted in this study underscore the importance of providing flexible options for PCRS based on partner type. Additional training for counselors, time for case-management and meetings with sex and drug partners and fieldwork for locating contacts are important considerations for providers.
Authors: Warren F Passin; Angela S Kim; Angela B Hutchinson; Nicole Crepaz; Jeffrey H Herbst; Cynthia M Lyles Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Matthew R Golden; William L H Whittington; H Hunter Handsfield; James P Hughes; Walter E Stamm; Matthew Hogben; Agnes Clark; Cheryl Malinski; Jennifer R L Helmers; Katherine K Thomas; King K Holmes Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-02-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Catherine Mathews; Nicol Coetzee; Merrick Zwarenstein; Carl Lombard; Sally Guttmacher; Andrew Oxman; George Schmid Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: R F Wykoff; J L Jones; S T Longshore; S L Hollis; C B Quiller; H Dowda; W B Gamble Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 1991 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Laurens Holmes; Emmanuel Monjok; Doriel Ward; Orsolya M Garrison; Evette D Toney; Gbadebo Ogungbade; E James Essien Journal: J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic) Date: 2008-03-04
Authors: Kathryn E Lancaster; William C Miller; Tetiana Kiriazova; Riza Sarasvita; Quynh Bui; Tran Viet Ha; Kostyantyn Dumchev; Hepa Susami; Erica L Hamilton; Scott Rose; Rebecca B Hershow; Vivian F Go; David Metzger; Irving F Hoffman; Carl A Latkin Journal: AIDS Educ Prev Date: 2019-04
Authors: Shirley J Semple; Heather A Pines; Steffanie A Strathdee; Alicia Harvey Vera; Gudelia Rangel; Carlos Magis-Rodriguez; Thomas L Patterson Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2018-07
Authors: Seth C Kalichman; Catherine Mathews; Moira Kalichman; Mark N Lurie; Sarah Dewing Journal: J Public Health (Oxf) Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 2.341
Authors: Binwei Song; Elin B Begley; Linda Lesondak; Kelly Voorhees; Magdalena Esquivel; Ronald L Merrick; Jack Carrel; Douglas Sebesta; James Vergeront; Dhana Shrestha; Emeka Oraka; Annisa Walker; James D Heffelfinger Journal: Open AIDS J Date: 2012-02-21