Literature DB >> 17449208

Joint match probabilities for Y chromosomal and autosomal markers.

Bruce Walsh1, Alan J Redd, Michael F Hammer.   

Abstract

Empirical tests of association between Y chromosome and autosomal markers are presented and a theoretical framework for determining a joint match probability is recommended. Statistical analyses of association were performed in 16 US populations between the autosomal genotypes from loci CSF1PO, FGA, THO1, TPOX, vWA, D3S1358, D5S818, D7S820, D8S1179, D13S317, D16S539, D18S512, D21S11 and Y chromosome haplotypes from loci DYS19, DYS385ab, DYS389I, DYS389II, DYS390, DYS391, DYS392, DYS393, DYS438, and DYS439. The sample populations include individuals of European-, African-, Hispanic-, Native-, and Asian-American ancestry. The results are consistent with independence of Y and autosomal markers, although small amounts of dependence would likely have escaped our tests. Given the data in hand, we suggest it is appropriate to compute joint match probabilities by multiplying the Y haplotype frequency with the appropriately corrected autosomal frequency. In addition to correcting for autosomal frequency differences between groups, a further correction may be required. Since two individuals sharing the same Y haplotype are likely to be more recently related than two randomly chosen individuals, the autosomal frequencies have to be adjusted to account for this, akin to the theta correction used to account for population substructure. The structure imposed on the autosomal frequencies conditioned in a Y match is a function of the number of markers scored and their mutation rate. However, in most settings theta<0.01. When population structure is already present in the autosomes, the additional effect due to conditioning on the Y is small. For example, if the amount of structure in the population is theta=0.01 or 0.03 (the NRCII range), then the effect of conditioning on the Y results in only a trivial increase in theta to 0.02-0.04, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17449208     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  5 in total

1.  Pedigree likelihood ratio for lineage markers.

Authors:  Jianye Ge; Arthur Eisenberg; Jiangwei Yan; Ranajit Chakraborty; Bruce Budowle
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  The combined evidential value of autosomal and Y-chromosomal DNA profiles obtained from the same sample.

Authors:  Jacob de Zoete; Marjan Sjerps; Ronald Meester; Eric Cator
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  The interpretation of lineage markers in forensic DNA testing.

Authors:  J S Buckleton; M Krawczak; B S Weir
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.882

4.  Molecular genetic identification of skeletal remains from the Second World War Konfin I mass grave in Slovenia.

Authors:  Irena Zupanic Pajnic; Barbara Gornjak Pogorelc; Joze Balazic
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  DNA identification by pedigree likelihood ratio accommodating population substructure and mutations.

Authors:  Jianye Ge; Bruce Budowle; Ranajit Chakraborty
Journal:  Investig Genet       Date:  2010-10-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.