Literature DB >> 17449061

Individual differences predict susceptibility to conditioned fear arising from psychosocial trauma.

Frederick R Walker1, Madeleine Hinwood, Louise Masters, Robert A Deilenberg, Trevor A Day.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Classical Pavlovian fear conditioning has been widely used in preclinical studies to gain insights into anxiety-related disorders. In this study we examined whether pre-existing behavioral differences, and/or behavioral differences displayed during fear induction, predict the severity of the conditioned fear response that can develop after an episode of psychosocial conflict.
METHODS: Prior to conditioning, male rats (intruders) were behaviorally assessed using the novel environment exploration and defensive burying tests. These animals were subsequently placed in the territory of an older male (resident) that invariably attacked the intruder.
RESULTS: Upon return to this territory 24 h later, intruders moved less than controls and produced more distress vocalizations, indicating conditioned fear to context. Additionally, analyses revealed that both pre-existing behavioral differences, and the animal's response during social conflict, predicted the magnitude of the subsequent conditioned fear response. Specifically, animals that engaged in higher levels of novel environment exploration, that exhibited a greater number of defensive burying behaviors, and that demonstrated higher levels of fighting and guarding during social conflict, displayed less evidence of conditioned fear.
CONCLUSION: These findings show that the behavioral variability existent within a normal outbred population can predict the magnitude of the conditioned fear response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17449061     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2007.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 0022-3956            Impact factor:   4.791


  8 in total

1.  Defeat-induced activation of the ventral medial prefrontal cortex is necessary for resistance to conditioned defeat.

Authors:  Kathleen E Morrison; Lauren R Bader; Colleen N McLaughlin; Matthew A Cooper
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Variability in automatically generated raw activity scores.

Authors:  Cristina Vargas-Irwin
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 3.558

3.  Individual differences in chemotherapy-induced anticipatory nausea.

Authors:  Marcial Rodríguez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-08-09

4.  Resilience to the effects of social stress: evidence from clinical and preclinical studies on the role of coping strategies.

Authors:  Susan K Wood; Seema Bhatnagar
Journal:  Neurobiol Stress       Date:  2015-01-01

5.  Temporal profiling of depression vulnerability in a preclinical model of sustained depression.

Authors:  D Riga; L J M Schmitz; W J G Hoogendijk; A B Smit; S Spijker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Individual baseline behavioral traits predict the resilience phenotype after chronic social defeat.

Authors:  Marija Milic; Ulrich Schmitt; Beat Lutz; Marianne B Müller
Journal:  Neurobiol Stress       Date:  2020-12-29

7.  Animal models of post-traumatic stress disorder: face validity.

Authors:  Sonal Goswami; Olga Rodríguez-Sierra; Michele Cascardi; Denis Paré
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Activity of a vmPFC-DRN Pathway Corresponds With Resistance to Acute Social Defeat Stress.

Authors:  J Alex Grizzell; Thomas T Clarity; Nate B Graham; Brooke N Dulka; Matthew A Cooper
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 3.492

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.