Literature DB >> 17449038

Plantar shear stress distributions: comparing actual and predicted frictional forces at the foot-ground interface.

Metin Yavuz1, Georgeanne Botek, Brian L Davis.   

Abstract

Plantar shear stresses are believed to play a major role in diabetic ulceration. Due to the lack of commercial devices that can measure plantar shear distribution, a number of mathematical models have been developed to predict plantar frictional forces. This study assessed the accuracy of these models using a custom-built platform capable of measuring plantar stresses simultaneously. A total of 48 (38 healthy and 10 diabetic) human subjects (75+/-20 kg, 41+/-20 years, 32 males, 16 females) were recruited in the study. Plantar force data were collected for 2s at 50 Hz. Two models (M1 and M2) reported in the literature by different groups were used to predict local shear stresses. Root mean squared errors (RMSE) were calculated to compare model data with the actual data, focusing on three parameters: location, magnitude and timing of peak shear components. RMSE values of estimated peak AP and ML shear locations were 3.1 and 2.2 cm for M1 and 3.1 and 2.1cm for M2, respectively. Magnitude RMS error values for M1 were found to be 86.6 kPa in AP shear and 38.5 kPa in ML shear, whereas these values were determined to be 97.8 and 63.5 kPa, respectively by M2. Time to peak shear RMSE values averaged 17.2% in terms of the gait duration. In conclusion, distribution of plantar shear should be measured rather than predicted, particularly if one is interested in the magnitudes of shear components.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17449038      PMCID: PMC2169498          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  11 in total

1.  In-shoe biaxial shear force measurement: the Kent shear system.

Authors:  F Akhlaghi; M G Pepper
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Variability of plantar pressure data. A comparison of the two-step and midgait methods.

Authors:  T G McPoil; M W Cornwall; L Dupuis; M Cornwell
Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc       Date:  1999-10

3.  Decubitus ulcers: role of pressure and friction in causation.

Authors:  S M Dinsdale
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  The forefoot-to-rearfoot plantar pressure ratio is increased in severe diabetic neuropathy and can predict foot ulceration.

Authors:  Antonella Caselli; Hau Pham; John M Giurini; David G Armstrong; Aristidis Veves
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Visual guidance to force plates does not influence ground reaction force variability.

Authors:  M D Grabiner; J W Feuerbach; T M Lundin; B L Davis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 6.  New developments in the biomechanics of the diabetic foot.

Authors:  P R Cavanagh; J S Ulbrecht; G M Caputo
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.876

7.  The effects of ulcer size and site, patient's age, sex and type and duration of diabetes on the outcome of diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  S O Oyibo; E B Jude; I Tarawneh; H C Nguyen; D G Armstrong; L B Harkless; A J Boulton
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.359

8.  A study of in-shoe plantar shear in patients with diabetic neuropathy.

Authors:  M Lord; R Hosein
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.063

9.  Is there a critical level of plantar foot pressure to identify patients at risk for neuropathic foot ulceration?

Authors:  D G Armstrong; E J Peters; K A Athanasiou; L A Lavery
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.286

10.  Method of healing diabetic forefoot ulcers.

Authors:  J P Pollard; L P Le Quesne
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-02-05
View more
  10 in total

1.  The shear mechanical properties of diabetic and non-diabetic plantar soft tissue.

Authors:  Shruti Pai; William R Ledoux
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Temporal characteristics of plantar shear distribution: relevance to diabetic patients.

Authors:  Metin Yavuz; Azita Tajaddini; Georgeanne Botek; Brian L Davis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Optimization of nonlinear hyperelastic coefficients for foot tissues using a magnetic resonance imaging deformation experiment.

Authors:  Marc Petre; Ahmet Erdemir; Vassilis P Panoskaltsis; Thomas A Spirka; Peter R Cavanagh
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  An apparatus to quantify anteroposterior and mediolateral shear reduction in shoe insoles.

Authors:  Barry Belmont; Yancheng Wang; Peethambaran Ammanath; James S Wrobel; Albert Shih
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-03-01

5.  American Society of Biomechanics Clinical Biomechanics Award 2012: plantar shear stress distributions in diabetic patients with and without neuropathy.

Authors:  Metin Yavuz
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  Measuring Plantar Tissue Stress in People With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Critical Concept in Diabetic Foot Management.

Authors:  Peter A Lazzarini; Ryan T Crews; Jaap J van Netten; Sicco A Bus; Malindu E Fernando; Paul J Chadwick; Bijan Najafi
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-04-29

7.  Histomorphological evaluation of diabetic and non-diabetic plantar soft tissue.

Authors:  Yak-Nam Wang; Kara Lee; William R Ledoux
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 8.  Diabetic foot biomechanics and gait dysfunction.

Authors:  James S Wrobel; Bijan Najafi
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-07-01

9.  Partitioning ground reaction forces for multi-segment foot joint kinetics.

Authors:  Dustin A Bruening; Kota Z Takahashi
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.840

10.  A new insole measurement system to detect bending and torsional moments at the human foot during footwear condition: a technical report.

Authors:  Thomas Stief; Klaus Peikenkamp
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.303

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.