Literature DB >> 17449023

Inhibition within a reference frame during the interpretation of spatial language.

Laura A Carlson1, Shannon R Van Deman.   

Abstract

Spatial terms such as right are potentially ambiguous because they can refer to different regions of space when defined by competing reference frames (e.g., my right within a relative reference frame versus an object's right within an intrinsic reference frame). In such situations, previous research has suggested that multiple reference frames are initially activated, followed by inhibition of the reference frame that is not ultimately selected to define the spatial term. Reference frames are complex multi-component representations, raising the question of exactly which components of the non-selected frame are inhibited. It is possible that the whole frame may be inhibited, including all axes and endpoints, or that only select endpoints and axes may be inhibited. Three experiments conducted using a negative priming paradigm revealed that only certain components of the non-selected reference frame were inhibited, consistent with the idea that some axes are privileged. These results also suggest that the components of a reference frame can be independently accessed. Implications for representing and accessing spatial information are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17449023     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  7 in total

1.  A neurobehavioral model of flexible spatial language behaviors.

Authors:  John Lipinski; Sebastian Schneegans; Yulia Sandamirskaya; John P Spencer; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Swing it to the left, swing it to the right: enacting flexible spatial language using a neurodynamic framework.

Authors:  John Lipinski; Yulia Sandamirskaya; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 5.082

3.  The misrepresentation of spatial uncertainty in visual search: Single- versus joint-distribution probability cues.

Authors:  Bradley S Gibson; Joseph R Pauszek; Jamie M Trost; Michael J Wenger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Transformations and representations supporting spatial perspective taking.

Authors:  Alfred B Yu; Jeffrey M Zacks
Journal:  Spat Cogn Comput       Date:  2017-06-01

5.  The role of scene type and priming in the processing and selection of a spatial frame of reference.

Authors:  Katrin Johannsen; Jan P De Ruiter
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-04-10

6.  Reference frame selection in dialog: priming or preference?

Authors:  Katrin Johannsen; Jan P De Ruiter
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Insight into others' minds: spatio-temporal representations by intrinsic frame of reference.

Authors:  Yanlong Sun; Hongbin Wang
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.