BACKGROUND: Measurement of cortisol is of particular importance for early diagnosis of adrenocorticotropic dysfunction and therapeutic monitoring. Saliva samples clearly present an easily manageable, non-invasive and anytime practicable assessment method of glucocorticoid production. The aims of the present study were to compare salivary cortisol collection method "Salivette" versus "passive drool", salivary cortisol concentrations with calculated free serum cortisol (FSC) and total serum cortisol (TSC) and the prediction of serum cortisol by salivary cortisol. METHODS: Saliva samples were collected by Sarstedt-Salivette(R) and by passive drooling into plastic tubes. Salivary cortisol, TSC measurements and calculation of FSC concentrations as well were carried out simultaneously in 10 healthy volunteers on two consecutive days at six definite points of time (08.00-23.00). RESULTS: Significant differences of salivary cortisol concentrations dependent on the saliva collection method (F-test 6.45; p=0.0317) and points of times were found (F-test 41.19; p<0.0001). Stronger overall correlation was observed in Salivette-salivary cortisol vs. TSC (r=0.813) and FSC (r=0.836) as compared to passive drooling. Specifically, more significant correlations were established in Salivettes vs. TSC (8/12 points of time, 66.7%) and FSC (8/12 points of time, 66.7%) than in passive drooling (TSC: 1/12 points of time, 8.3% and FSC: 2/12 points of time, 16.7%). Importantly, cortisol in Salivettes was a better predictor for FSC and TSC than passive drooling. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that salivary cortisol measurement with Salivettes is a reliable prediction method of total and calculated free serum cortisol levels. Moreover, it is a convenient method for saliva collection, handling and laboratory processing.
BACKGROUND: Measurement of cortisol is of particular importance for early diagnosis of adrenocorticotropic dysfunction and therapeutic monitoring. Saliva samples clearly present an easily manageable, non-invasive and anytime practicable assessment method of glucocorticoid production. The aims of the present study were to compare salivary cortisol collection method "Salivette" versus "passive drool", salivary cortisol concentrations with calculated free serum cortisol (FSC) and total serum cortisol (TSC) and the prediction of serum cortisol by salivary cortisol. METHODS: Saliva samples were collected by Sarstedt-Salivette(R) and by passive drooling into plastic tubes. Salivary cortisol, TSC measurements and calculation of FSC concentrations as well were carried out simultaneously in 10 healthy volunteers on two consecutive days at six definite points of time (08.00-23.00). RESULTS: Significant differences of salivary cortisol concentrations dependent on the saliva collection method (F-test 6.45; p=0.0317) and points of times were found (F-test 41.19; p<0.0001). Stronger overall correlation was observed in Salivette-salivary cortisol vs. TSC (r=0.813) and FSC (r=0.836) as compared to passive drooling. Specifically, more significant correlations were established in Salivettes vs. TSC (8/12 points of time, 66.7%) and FSC (8/12 points of time, 66.7%) than in passive drooling (TSC: 1/12 points of time, 8.3% and FSC: 2/12 points of time, 16.7%). Importantly, cortisol in Salivettes was a better predictor for FSC and TSC than passive drooling. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that salivary cortisol measurement with Salivettes is a reliable prediction method of total and calculated free serum cortisol levels. Moreover, it is a convenient method for saliva collection, handling and laboratory processing.
Authors: Lynnette K Nieman; Beverly M K Biller; James W Findling; John Newell-Price; Martin O Savage; Paul M Stewart; Victor M Montori Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2008-03-11 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Matteo Giletta; Casey D Calhoun; Paul D Hastings; Karen D Rudolph; Matthew K Nock; Mitchell J Prinstein Journal: J Abnorm Child Psychol Date: 2015-07
Authors: Kamala J Rapp-Santos; Louis A Altamura; Sarah L Norris; Luis A Lugo-Roman; Pedro J Rico; Christian C Hofer Journal: J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 1.232
Authors: Giuseppe Bellastella; Maria Ida Maiorino; Annamaria De Bellis; Maria Teresa Vietri; Carmela Mosca; Lorenzo Scappaticcio; Daniela Pasquali; Katherine Esposito; Dario Giugliano Journal: Endocrine Date: 2015-10-28 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Susan K Putnam; Christopher Lopata; Jeffery D Fox; Marcus L Thomeer; Jonathan D Rodgers; Martin A Volker; Gloria K Lee; Erik G Neilans; Jilynn Werth Journal: Child Psychiatry Hum Dev Date: 2012-08