Literature DB >> 17448869

Does concurrent radiochemotherapy affect cosmetic results in the adjuvant setting after breast-conserving surgery? Results of the ARCOSEIN multicenter, Phase III study: patients' and doctors' views.

Alain H Toledano1, Marc A Bollet, Alain Fourquet, David Azria, Joseph Gligorov, Pascal Garaud, Daniel Serin, Jean-François Bosset, Joelle Miny-Buffet, Anne Favre, Olivier LeFoch, Gilles Calais.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the cosmetic results of sequential vs. concurrent adjuvant chemotherapy with radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer, and to compare ratings by patients and physicians. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1996 to 2000, 716 patients with Stage I-II breast cancers were included in a multicenter, Phase III trial (the ARCOSEIN study) comparing, after breast-conserving surgery with axillary dissection, sequential treatment with chemotherapy first followed by radiotherapy vs. chemotherapy administered concurrently with radiotherapy. Cosmetic results with regard to both the overall aspect of the breast and specific changes (color, scar) were evaluated in a total of 214 patients (107 in each arm) by means of questionnaires to both the patient and a physician whose rating was blinded to treatment allocation.
RESULTS: Patients' overall satisfaction with cosmesis was not statistically different between the two arms, with approximately 92% with at least satisfactory results (p = 0.72), although differences between the treated and untreated breasts were greater after the concurrent regimen (29% vs. 14% with more than moderate differences; p = 0.0015). Physician assessment of overall cosmesis was less favorable, with lower rates of at least satisfactory results in the concurrent arm (60% vs. 85%; p = 0.001). Consequently, the concordance for overall satisfaction with cosmesis between patients and doctors was only fair (kappa = 0.62).
CONCLUSION: After breast-conserving surgery, the concurrent use of chemotherapy with radiotherapy is significantly associated with greater differences between the breasts. These differences do not translate into patients' lessened satisfaction with cosmesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17448869     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  3 in total

Review 1.  Hypofractionated breast irradiation: a multidisciplinary review of the Senonetwork study group.

Authors:  Bruno Meduri; Fiorenza De Rose; Carlo Cabula; Isabella Castellano; Lucia Da Ros; Massimo Maria Grassi; Sandra Orrù; Fabio Puglisi; Rubina Manuela Trimboli; Antonella Ciabattoni
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Conservative surgery, external radiotherapy, and HDR brachytherapy in a single fraction of 7 Gy in early breast cancer: long-term toxicity and esthetic assessment.

Authors:  Aurora Rodríguez Pérez; Maria Concepción López Carrizosa; Pilar Maria Samper Ots; José Fermín Pérez-Regadera Gómez; José Zapatero Ortuño; Juan de Dios Sáez Garrido; Manuel Joaquín Martín de Miguel
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  The optimal sequence of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Hamza Abbas; Ashraf Elyamany; Mohamed Salem; Ahmed Salem; Salah Binziad; Basem Gamal
Journal:  Int Arch Med       Date:  2011-10-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.