Literature DB >> 17448834

The submental flap in facial reconstruction: advantages and limitations.

Abdeljalil Abouchadi1, Nathalie Capon-Degardin, Philippe Patenôtre, Veronique Martinot-Duquennoy, Philippe Pellerin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Complex defects resulting from surgical excision of facial cancer sometimes require reconstruction using microvascular free tissue transfer. Tissue transfer from areas distant from the face can resolve many problems, but often provides a poor cosmetic match with facial skin. The submental flap helps surmount this problem. Cervical skin has similarities with face skin, and because this is a regional flap, it helps eliminate microsurgical risks. In this article we present a series of 9 cases, review the anatomy and the surgical technique, and explain the advantages and limitations of the submental flap. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A successive series of 9 patients in which this reconstruction was performed was reviewed retrospectively, and the results were analyzed.
RESULTS: Submental flap facial reconstruction was performed on 9 patients (8 men and 1 woman) between 1993 and 2004. Mean patient age was 53.6 years (range, 43 to 81 years). Eight of the 9 external skin coverage cases were associated with excision of cutaneous malignancies; 1 case involved treatment of burn sequelae. There were no cases of marginal mandibular nerve palsy. In 6 cases, venous drainage was disrupted after raising the flap, but without causing flap loss. This disruption was overcome in 4 to 5 days without the need for flap revision or any other interventions. Partial loss of the distal extent of the flap occurred in 2 cases. In all cases, moderately good skin color and texture match was achieved. Debulking of the flap was needed in 6 cases. The donor site recovered well with no hypertrophic scarring and no restriction to neck movement.
CONCLUSIONS: The submental artery island flap is a useful reconstructive procedure that offers options to the reconstructive surgeon and has definite advantages over distant flaps in terms of ease of dissection and donor site appearance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17448834     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.05.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  10 in total

1.  Oncological Safety of Submental Artery Island Flap in Oral Reconstruction - Analysis of 229 Cases.

Authors:  Shaji Thomas; Bipin T Varghese; S Alagu Ganesh; Kapil Prabhu Desai; Elizabeth Mathew Iype; P G Balagopal; Paul Sebastian
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-06-20

2.  Treatment of eccrine carcinoma of the chin via submental island flap.

Authors:  Effie Pappas-Politis; David C Driscoll; Yvonne N Pierpont; Paul R Albear; William L Carter; Lisa J Gould
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2010-04-08

3.  [Submental artery island flaps for reconstruction in the head and neck region].

Authors:  K-L Bruchhage; B Wollenberg; U Schröder
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  The submental flap for oral cavity reconstruction: extended indications and technical refinements.

Authors:  Ayman A Amin; Mostafa A Sakkary; Ashraf A Khalil; Mohammmed A Rifaat; Sherif B Zayed
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2011-12-20

5.  Vascular anatomy is a determining factor of successful submental flap raising: a retrospective study of 70 clinical cases.

Authors:  Hung-Che Lin; Yuahn-Sieh Huang; Yueng-Hsiang Chu; Shao-Cheng Liu; Wei-Chuan Shangkuan; Wen-Sen Lai; Jinn-Moon Yang; Yaoh-Shiang Lin; Kuo-Hsing Ma; Jih-Chin Lee
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  The Submental Island Flap in Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Muhammad Faisal; Mohammad Adeel; Sheryar Riaz; Abdullah Anwar; Asma Rashid; Sadaf Usman; Arif Jamshed; Raza Hussain
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018 Jul-Dec

7.  Modified submental platysmal adipomyofascial flap: is it a reliable alternate reconstructive option for small- to mid-sized defects especially in male patients with oral/oropharyngeal cancer?

Authors:  Abhishek Singh; Anshu Chopra; Shashank Chaudhary; Manikandan Venkatasubramaniyan; Kiran Joshi; Mudit Agarwal
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  The submental flap: Be wary.

Authors:  Courtney B Shires; Merry Sebelik
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2022-01-07

9.  The Submental Island Flap Is a Viable Reconstructive Option for a Variety of Head and Neck Ablative Defects.

Authors:  Blair M Barton; Charles A Riley; Jason D Pou; Christian P Hasney; Brian A Moore
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2018

10.  Submental versus platysma flap for the reconstruction of complex facial defects following resection of head and neck tumors.

Authors:  Jawad Safdar; Fa-Yu Liu; Yousuf Moosa; Zhong-Fei Xu; Zhen-Ning Li; Chang-Fu Sun
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.088

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.