Literature DB >> 17448695

Shoulder arthroplasty: the socket perspective.

Frederick A Matsen1, Ryan T Bicknell, Steven B Lippitt.   

Abstract

Although much attention has been directed to the development of the humeral components used in shoulder arthroplasty, the major unsolved challenge lies on the glenoid side of the articulation. This challenge arises from difficulties resisting eccentric loading and providing adequate implant-bone fixation. Current glenoid component designs use polyethylene and polymethyl methacrylate and are prone to loosening, plastic deformation, particulate debris, and third-body wear. Metal-backed components present further challenges, and results have generally been disappointing. There is interest in biologic resurfacing procedures, including the interposition of fascia, capsule, or meniscal allograft and nonprosthetic glenoid arthroplasty, or what has become known as the "ream-and-run" procedure. Despite encouraging results, important questions remain unanswered about these procedures. However, each may warrant further exploration with a goal of providing an effective and durable approach to glenoid arthritis that avoids the risks associated with polymethyl methacrylate and polyethylene.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17448695     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.02.112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  10 in total

1.  Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: an update on indications, technique, results and complication rates.

Authors:  Lorenzo Mattei; Stefano Mortera; Chiara Arrigoni; Filippo Castoldi
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2015-11-03

2.  Use of a custom alignment guide to improve glenoid component position in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Eduardo M Suero; Musa Citak; Darrick Lo; Aaron J Krych; Edward V Craig; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Glenoid or not glenoid component in primary osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Kany Jean
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-11-30

4.  No differences in early results of a hybrid glenoid compared with a pegged implant.

Authors:  Lawrence V Gulotta; K Lauchlan Chambers; Russell F Warren; David M Dines; Edward V Craig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The glenoid in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mark Schrumpf; Travis Maak; Sommer Hammoud; Edward V Craig
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2011-12

6.  CT-Based 3D Printing of the Glenoid Prior to Shoulder Arthroplasty: Bony Morphology and Model Evaluation.

Authors:  Kenneth C Wang; Anja Jones; Shivkumar Kambhampati; Mohit N Gilotra; Peter C Liacouras; Satre Stuelke; Brian Shiu; Natalie Leong; S Ashfaq Hasan; Eliot L Siegel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  The ream and run: not for every patient, every surgeon or every problem.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Total shoulder arthroplasty in dislocation arthropathy.

Authors:  Lars Lehmann; Petra Magosch; Eckhard Mauermann; Sven Lichtenberg; Peter Habermeyer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Cartilage decisively shapes the glenoid concavity and contributes significantly to shoulder stability.

Authors:  F Souleiman; I Zderic; T Pastor; P Varga; T Helfen; G Richards; B Gueorguiev; J Theopold; G Osterhoff; P Hepp
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-04-17       Impact factor: 4.114

10.  Glenohumeral kinematics after soft tissue interposition graft and glenoid reaming: A cadaveric study.

Authors:  Nickolas G Garbis; Alexander E Weber; Elizabeth F Shewman; Brian J Cole; Anthony A Romeo; Nikhil N Verma
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.251

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.