Literature DB >> 1744759

Gastroenterology consultations from the internal medicine physician's perspective.

J P Waring1, J A DiSario, R A Sanowski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the patterns of use of gastroenterology consultations by internal medicine physicians.
DESIGN: A survey of licensed physicians in the three metropolitan areas in Arizona where gastroenterologists are available. The physicians were asked how likely they were to obtain gastroenterology consultations for a variety of different gastrointestinal illnesses. Comparisons between groups were done with chi-square analysis.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Forty-six percent of the physicians responded. The majority of respondents believed that esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy should be available without gastroenterology consultation (65% and 64%, respectively). Physicians in practice more than ten years were less prone to request consultation for gastrointestinal complaints that were likely to result in endoscopic procedures, such as the diagnosis of peptic ulcer disease or inflammatory bowel disease, or guaiac-positive stool. Internal medicine residents were more likely to seek consultations for both endoscopic and cognitive gastrointestinal complaints. Internal medicine residents were far more likely to request gastroenterology consultations for most patients with upper-gastrointestinal-tract bleeding (91% vs. 60%, p less than 0.001) and lower-gastrointestinal-tract bleeding (65% vs. 22%, p less than 0.0001) than were internists practicing more than ten years.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of internal medicine physicians would like to order endoscopic procedures without gastroenterology consultations, much as they order radiography. Recently trained physicians are far more likely to request consultants for procedure-related problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1744759     DOI: 10.1007/bf02598166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  6 in total

1.  The gastroenterologist: physician or technician?

Authors:  J A DiSario; J P Waring; R A Sanowski; D D Wadas
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Endoscopic studies of dyspepsia in a general practice.

Authors:  M W Gear; R J Barnes
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-05-03

3.  The use and misuse of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  K L Kahn; J Kosecoff; M R Chassin; D H Solomon; R H Brook
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1988-10-15       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Primary panendoscopy.

Authors:  B F Overholt; R L Hargrove; R K Farris; F R Porter
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  "Open-access" endoscopy for general practitioners. Experience of a private gastrointestinal clinic.

Authors:  J A Goy; E Herold; P J Jenkins; J C Colman; D M Russell
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1986-01-20       Impact factor: 7.738

Review 6.  Detection and surveillance of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D E Fleischer; S B Goldberg; T H Browning; J N Cooper; E Friedman; F H Goldner; E B Keeffe; L E Smith
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-01-27       Impact factor: 56.272

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  The Jeremiah Metzger Lecture. The future of generalism.

Authors:  J A Barondess
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  1993
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.