Literature DB >> 17447143

Gender differences in the media interviews of Bill and Hillary Clinton.

Camelia Suleiman1, Daniel C O'Connell.   

Abstract

Does gender make a difference in the way politicians speak and are spoken to in public? This paper examines perspective in three television interviews and two radio interviews with Bill Clinton in June 2004 and in three television interviews and two radio interviews with Hillary Clinton in June 2003 with the same interviewers. Our perspectival approach assumes that each utterance has a dialogically constructed point of view. Earlier research has shown that markers of conceptual orality and literacy as well as referencing (name and pronoun use for self and other reference) do reflect perspective. This paper asks whether perspective is gendered. Our data analysis demonstrates that some markers of perspective show gender differences while others do not. Those that do include the number of syllables spoken by each interlocutor, referencing, the use of the intensifier so, the use of the hedge you know, the use of non-standard pronunciations, turn transitions, and lastly the use of laughter.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17447143     DOI: 10.1007/s10936-007-9055-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  1 in total

1.  "If you and I, if we, in this later day, lose that sacred fire . . .": perspective in political interviews.

Authors:  Camelia Suleiman; Daniel C O'Connell; Sabine Kowal
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2002-05
  1 in total
  1 in total

1.  Race and gender in current American politics: a discourse-analytic perspective.

Authors:  Camelia Suleiman; Daniel C O'Connell
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2008-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.