Literature DB >> 1744670

Comparative effects of cuff size and tightness of fit on accuracy of blood pressure measurements.

T E Banner1, J S Gravenstein.   

Abstract

To determine the effect of snugness of cuff wrap on the accuracy of blood pressure (BP) measurements, we performed two studies on 6 healthy volunteers. In both studies, control values were obtained from the right upper arm with cuffs of appropriate size and snug fit. Study 1 had two phases. In the first, cuffs of appropriate size were wrapped snugly around the upper left arm of seated subjects. The effects of two other degrees of cuff snugness on the measurement of BP were evaluated by placing a filled 250-mL intravenous fluid bag between the cuff and arm over the triceps, measuring BP, then draining the same bag of half its contents and then all of its contents without rewrapping the cuff ("loose," "very loose" fit), each time measuring BP. The second phase of study 1 was identical in procedure, except that the cuffs used on the left arm were one size too small. In study 2, the experimental cuffs were placed just above the right ankle. To alter the signal-to-noise ratio, BP was raised or lowered: the standing position elevated mean BP by an average of 90 mm Hg, and elevation of the legs decreased mean BP by an average of 43 mm Hg. In study 1, we found that appropriately sized cuffs, whether wrapped tightly or loosely, gave correct BP readings. Cuffs snugly wrapped, but too small for the subject, gave high BP readings, on the average by approximately 10 mm Hg. Loose wrapping of small cuffs gave variable results in individual subjects that exaggerated systolic BP from 2 to 80 mm Hg. In study 2, elevating the legs or standing decreased or increased BP consistently. Loose wrapping of appropriately sized cuffs around the ankles of the subjects had no additional significant effect on BP.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1744670     DOI: 10.1007/bf01619345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit        ISSN: 0748-1977


  4 in total

1.  EFFECT OF SIZE OF CUFF BLADDER ON ACCURACY OF MEASUREMENT OF INDIRECT BLOOD PRESSURE.

Authors:  J A SIMPSON; G JAMIESON; D W DICKHAUS; R F GROVER
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1965-08       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Measurement of blood pressure in obese persons.

Authors:  C A BERTRAND; K W TROUT; M H WILLIAMS
Journal:  J Am Med Assoc       Date:  1956-11-03

3.  Blood pressure monitoring: automated oscillometric devices.

Authors:  M Ramsey
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1991-01

4.  The error in indirect blood pressure measurement with the incorrect size of cuff.

Authors:  L A Geddes; S J Whistler
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 4.749

  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  Validation of Omron RS8, RS6, and RS3 home blood pressure monitoring devices, in accordance with the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010.

Authors:  Hakuo Takahashi; Masamichi Yoshika; Toyohiko Yokoi
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2013-05-28

2.  Validation of two automatic devices, Omron HEM-6232T and HEM-6181, for self-measurement of blood pressure at the wrist according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2013 protocol and the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010.

Authors:  Kanako Saito; Yukiko Hishiki; Hakuo Takahashi
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2019-03-06

3.  Validation of an Automated and Adjustable Blood Pressure System for Use with a Public Health Station.

Authors:  Timothy R Macaulay; David N Erceg; Bjorn McMillan; Joel E Ramirez; Jesus F Dominguez; Alberto F Vallejo; E Todd Schroeder
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2020-04-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.