Literature DB >> 17445878

Right hemisphere sensitivity to novel metaphoric relations: application of the signal detection theory.

N Mashal1, M Faust.   

Abstract

The present study used the signal detection theory to test the hypothesis that the right hemisphere (RH) is more sensitive than the left hemisphere (LH) to the distant semantic relations in novel metaphoric expressions. In two divided visual field experiments, sensitivity (d') and criterion (beta) were calculated for responses to different types of word pairs. In the first experiment, subjects were presented with unfamiliar two-word novel metaphoric expressions ("signal") and unrelated word-pairs ("noise"). In the second experiment, literal expressions ("signal") and unrelated word pairs ("noise") were presented. In line with the Coarse Semantic Coding Theory [Beeman, M. (1998). Coarse semantic coding and discourse comprehension. In: M. Beeman & C. Chiarello (Eds.). Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 255-284.] as well as with the Graded Salience Hypothesis [Giora, R. (2003). On our mind: Salience, context and figurative language. New York: Oxford University Press.], the findings suggest that the RH is more sensitive than the LH to unfamiliar metaphoric relations. Furthermore, this RH advantage in processing distant semantic relations did not extend to familiar semantic relations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17445878     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  9 in total

1.  The role of the right hemisphere in metaphor comprehension: a meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies.

Authors:  Jie Yang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Contextual Constraint Treatment for coarse coding deficit in adults with right hemisphere brain damage: generalisation to narrative discourse comprehension.

Authors:  Margaret Lehman Blake; Connie A Tompkins; Victoria L Scharp; Kimberly M Meigh; Julie Wambaugh
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.868

3.  Structural properties of corpus callosum are associated differently with verbal creativity and visual creativity.

Authors:  Xinran Wu; Qunlin Chen; Xi Wang; Zhiting Ren; Dongtao Wei; Jiangzhou Sun; Jie Zhang; Xinyu Liang; Yaya Jiang; Suyu Zhong; Gaolang Gong; Jiang Qiu
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 3.270

4.  Hemispheric Processing of Chinese Scientific Metaphors: Evidence via Hemifield Presentation.

Authors:  Min Huang; Lexian Shen; Shuyuan Xu; Yanhong Huang; Shaojuan Huang; Xuemei Tang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-26

5.  Right hemisphere dysfunction and metaphor comprehension in young adults with Asperger syndrome.

Authors:  Rinat Gold; Miriam Faust
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2010-07

6.  Neural correlates of metaphor processing: the roles of figurativeness, familiarity and difficulty.

Authors:  Gwenda L Schmidt; Carol A Seger
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  On the Role of Bilateral Brain Hypofunction and Abnormal Lateralization of Cortical Information Flow as Neural Underpinnings of Conventional Metaphor Processing Impairment in Schizophrenia: An fMRI and EEG Study.

Authors:  Przemysław Adamczyk; Martin Jáni; Tomasz S Ligeza; Olga Płonka; Piotr Błądziński; Miroslaw Wyczesany
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  HD-tDCS over motor cortex facilitates figurative and literal action sentence processing.

Authors:  Karim Johari; Nicholas Riccardi; Svetlana Malyutina; Mirage Modi; Rutvik H Desai
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 3.054

9.  Action verbs are processed differently in metaphorical and literal sentences depending on the semantic match of visual primes.

Authors:  Melissa Troyer; Lauren B Curley; Luke E Miller; Ayse P Saygin; Benjamin K Bergen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.