Literature DB >> 17445868

Differences in the aerosolization behavior of microorganisms as revealed through their transport by biogas.

Marina Moletta1, Jean-Philippe Delgenes, Jean-Jacques Godon.   

Abstract

The aerosol microbial diversity of biogas was analyzed in order to examine the aerosolization behavior of microorganisms. Six biogas samples were analyzed: five from mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestors treating different wastes, and one from landfill. Epifluorescent microscopic counts reveal that with 10(6) Prokarya m(-3), only one per one thousand billion were aerosolized from the digestor sludges to the biogas. SSU (Small Sub Unit) ribosomal fingerprinting (Single Strand Conformation Polymorphism) shows that microbial communities in the biogas were not just a rough copy of anaerobic digestor microbial communities and underlines that all microorganisms are not equally convoyed by biogas. To assess the difference occurring in aerosolization, 675 biogas-borne SSU ribosomal DNA were analyzed and compared to published anaerobic digestor microbial diversity. Results show that microorganisms belonging to Archaea, Deltaproteobacteria, Spirochaetes, Thermotogae, Chloroflexi phyla and sulfate-reducing groups were non-aerosolized whereas microorganisms belonging to Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, TM7 phyla as well as strictly aerobic and occasionally pathogenic species presented high levels of aerosolization. Finally, microorganisms belonging to Actinobacteria, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes phyla represent passively-aerosolized microorganisms with similar frequencies in biogas-borne and anaerobic digestor microbial communities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17445868     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.02.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  Microbial structure and chemical components of aerosols caused by rotating brushes in a wastewater treatment plant.

Authors:  Yunping Han; Lin Li; Junxin Liu; Mengzhu Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Diversity of bacteria and fungi in aerosols during screening in a green waste composting plant.

Authors:  Valérie Bru-Adan; Nathalie Wéry; Marina Moletta-Denat; Patrick Boiron; Jean-Philippe Delgènes; Jean-Jacques Godon
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Culture-independent characterization of archaeal biodiversity in swine confinement building bioaerosols.

Authors:  Benjamin Nehmé; Yan Gilbert; Valérie Létourneau; Robert J Forster; Marc Veillette; Richard Villemur; Caroline Duchaine
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Bioaerosol Sampler Choice Should Consider Efficiency and Ability of Samplers To Cover Microbial Diversity.

Authors:  Hamza Mbareche; Marc Veillette; Guillaume J Bilodeau; Caroline Duchaine
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Impact of serotype and sequence type on the preferential aerosolization of Streptococcus suis.

Authors:  Léa Gauthier-Levesque; Laetitia Bonifait; Nathalie Turgeon; Marc Veillette; Phillipa Perrott; Daniel Grenier; Caroline Duchaine
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2016-05-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.