Literature DB >> 17443720

Distribution and patterns of lymph nodes metastases and micrometastases in the mesorectum of rectal cancer.

Yang-Chun Zheng1, Zong-Guang Zhou, Li Li, Wen-Zhang Lei, Yi-Ling Deng, Dai-Yun Chen, Wei-Ping Liu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Facts buried in the mesorectum remain to be unveiled. This study investigated the number, size, and detailed distribution of lymph nodes metastases and micrometastases within the mesorectum of rectal cancer.
METHODS: Thirty-one patients who underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) were treated with lymph node revealing solution to retrieve lymph nodes, which were submitted to hematoxylin and eosin (HE) examination and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining.
RESULTS: The mean number of mesorectal nodes per case was 17.7. The mean size of metastatic, micrometastatic, and isolated tumor cells (ITC) harbored nodes was 5.2 mm, 4.5 mm, and 3.3 mm, respectively. Most of the metastatic (92.1%), micrometastatic and ITC-involved nodes (69.2%) were located along the superior rectal artery (SRA). Posterior-wall located tumor might spread along both sides of the mesorectum simultaneously (P = 0.34), while lateral-wall located tumor spread preferably to ipsolateral side versus contralateral side (P = 0.012).
CONCLUSION: Most of the metastases and micrometastases positive lymph nodes were smaller than 5 mm and distributed along the SRA. The patterns of lymph nodes spread were related to the circumferential situation of tumor in the rectal wall. Surgical excision of the rectal cancer should completely remove the whole mesorectum, especially to avoid any damage of the mesorectum on tumor side. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17443720     DOI: 10.1002/jso.20826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  6 in total

Review 1.  Required distal mesorectal resection margin in partial mesorectal excision: a systematic review on distal mesorectal spread.

Authors:  A A J Grüter; A S van Lieshout; S E van Oostendorp; J C F Ket; M Tenhagen; F C den Boer; R Hompes; P J Tanis; J B Tuynman
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 3.699

Review 2.  Lymph Nodes Evaluation in Rectal Cancer: Where Do We Stand and Future Perspective.

Authors:  Alessandra Borgheresi; Federica De Muzio; Andrea Agostini; Letizia Ottaviani; Alessandra Bruno; Vincenza Granata; Roberta Fusco; Ginevra Danti; Federica Flammia; Roberta Grassi; Francesca Grassi; Federico Bruno; Pierpaolo Palumbo; Antonio Barile; Vittorio Miele; Andrea Giovagnoni
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  The number of lymph nodes is correlated with mesorectal morphometry.

Authors:  N Pirro; C Pignodel; P Cathala; P Fabbro-Peray; G Godlewski; M Prudhomme
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Effective dissection for rectal cancer with lateral lymph node metastasis based on prognostic factors and recurrence type.

Authors:  Hajime Morohashi; Yoshiyuki Sakamoto; Takuya Miura; Daichi Ichinohe; Kotaro Umemura; Takanobu Akaishi; Kentaro Sato; Daisuke Kuwata; Keisuke Yamazaki; Taiichi Wakiya; Kenichi Hakamada
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Distribution of Lymph Nodes in Stage III Patients With Mid and Low Rectal Cancer: Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Sohyun Kim
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2018-02-28

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging at ultra-high magnetic field strength: An in vivo assessment of number, size and distribution of pelvic lymph nodes.

Authors:  Ansje S Fortuin; Bart W J Philips; Marloes M G van der Leest; Mark E Ladd; Stephan Orzada; Marnix C Maas; Tom W J Scheenen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.