Literature DB >> 17443583

Psychological treatments versus treatment as usual for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD).

I Gava1, C Barbui, E Aguglia, D Carlino, R Churchill, M De Vanna, H F McGuire.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) is a chronic anxiety disorder associated with significant morbidity, social impairment and lower quality of life. Psychological treatments are a frequently used approach for OCD.
OBJECTIVES: To perform a systematic review of randomised trials of psychological treatments for obsessive compulsive disorder in comparison with treatment as usual. SEARCH STRATEGY: We conducted an electronic search of CCDANCTR-Studies (31/10/2006), and other databases. We searched reference lists, and contacted experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Published and unpublished randomised trials of psychological treatments versus treatment as usual for adults with a diagnosis of OCD DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors worked independently throughout the selection of trials and data extraction. Findings were compared and disagreements were discussed with a third review author. Full data extraction, using a standardised data extraction sheet, was performed on all studies included in the review. Results were synthesised using Review Manager software. For dichotomous data, odds ratios were calculated. For continuous data, effect sizes were obtained and the standardised mean difference, with 95% confidence intervals, was calculated. Fixed and random effects models were used to pool the data. Reasons for heterogeneity in studies were explored and sensitivity analyses were performed by excluding trials of lower quality. MAIN
RESULTS: Eight studies (11 study comparisons) were identified, all of which compared cognitive and/or behavioural treatments versus treatment as usual control groups. Seven studies (ten comparisons) had usable data for meta-analyses. These studies demonstrated that patients receiving any variant of cognitive behavioural treatment exhibited significantly fewer symptoms post-treatment than those receiving treatment as usual (SMD -1.24, 95% CI -1.61 to -0.87, I(2) test for heterogeneity 33.4%). Different types of cognitive and/or behavioural treatments showed similar differences in effect when compared with treatment as usual. The overall treatment effect appeared to be influenced by differences in baseline severity. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review suggest that psychological treatments derived from cognitive behavioural models are an effective treatment for adult patients with obsessive compulsive disorder. Larger high quality randomised controlled trials involving longer follow up periods are needed, to further test cognitive behavioural treatments, and other psychological approaches, in comparison to each other and control conditions. Future trials should examine the predictors of response to each treatment, and also conduct cost-effectiveness evaluations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17443583     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005333.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  25 in total

Review 1.  Obsessive compulsive disorder.

Authors:  G Mustafa Soomro
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2012-01-18

Review 2.  [Psychotherapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: what is evidence based?].

Authors:  A K Külz; U Voderholzer
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  Pragmatic Competency and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Comparative Assessment with Normal Controls.

Authors:  Shima Ghahari; Hamidreza Hassani; Maryam Purmofrad
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-08

Review 4.  Usual and unusual care: existing practice control groups in randomized controlled trials of behavioral interventions.

Authors:  Kenneth E Freedland; David C Mohr; Karina W Davidson; Joseph E Schwartz
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 4.312

Review 5.  Deep brain stimulation for psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Paul E Holtzheimer; Helen S Mayberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 6.  Canadian clinical practice guidelines for the management of anxiety, posttraumatic stress and obsessive-compulsive disorders.

Authors:  Martin A Katzman; Pierre Bleau; Pierre Blier; Pratap Chokka; Kevin Kjernisted; Michael Van Ameringen; Martin M Antony; Stéphane Bouchard; Alain Brunet; Martine Flament; Sophie Grigoriadis; Sandra Mendlowitz; Kieron O'Connor; Kiran Rabheru; Peggy M A Richter; Melisa Robichaud; John R Walker
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 3.630

7.  Enhancing Inhibitory Learning: The Utility of Variability in Exposure.

Authors:  Kelly A Knowles; Bunmi O Olatunji
Journal:  Cogn Behav Pract       Date:  2018-01-31

8.  Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  E Andersson; J Enander; P Andrén; E Hedman; B Ljótsson; T Hursti; J Bergström; V Kaldo; N Lindefors; G Andersson; C Rück
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 7.723

9.  Disagreements in meta-analyses using outcomes measured on continuous or rating scales: observer agreement study.

Authors:  Britta Tendal; Julian P T Higgins; Peter Jüni; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Sven Trelle; Eveline Nüesch; Simon Wandel; Anders W Jørgensen; Katarina Gesser; Søren Ilsøe-Kristensen; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-08-13

10.  The efficacy of exposure and response prevention for geriatric obsessive compulsive disorder: a clinical case illustration.

Authors:  Mairwen K Jones; Bethany M Wootton; Lisa D Vaccaro
Journal:  Case Rep Psychiatry       Date:  2012-12-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.